The Dolphins Make Me Cry.com - Forums

TDMMC Forums => Dolphins Discussion => Topic started by: hordman on December 12, 2010, 08:44:10 pm



Title: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: hordman on December 12, 2010, 08:44:10 pm
nothing to see here folks, move along.

(http://thebiglead.fantasysportsven.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/350_dirty-jets-coach.jpg)

Sunday afternoon, Jets strength conditioning coach Sal Alosi in the New Meadowlands Stadium

Monday morning, ex-Jets strength conditioning coach out of a job....sweet

this was double-win Sunday for the Phins!


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: MikeO on December 12, 2010, 08:49:02 pm
He should be BANNED from the NFL for life. Never to work for any NFL team again.

And the Jets should lose a late round draft pick for this. The team must be responsible for their own sideline and when a coach/staff member interfers with the play on the field during the game, swift action must be taken.


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: Dave Gray on December 12, 2010, 08:56:35 pm
It will be very interesting to see what the NFL does about this.  I wouldn't be surprised to see them take no action.


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: MyGodWearsAHoodie on December 12, 2010, 08:59:34 pm
He should be BANNED from the NFL for life. Never to work for any NFL team again.

And the Jets should lose a late round draft pick for this. The team must be responsible for their own sideline and when a coach/staff member interfers with the play on the field during the game, swift action must be taken.

While I would not mind seeing that.  I think it is a bit over the top. 

One or two game suspension plus a hefty fine ($15k -$25k). Which is the absolute maximum that would have occurred if he was a player instead of a coach.   


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: MikeO on December 12, 2010, 09:21:37 pm
Well I think the Jets will fire him in all honesty tomorrow. I mean if they don't they will have the NFL breathing down their neck.

Then the NFL will throw some BS fine at the Jets.

And all will be forgotten by Wednesday


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: Dave Gray on December 12, 2010, 09:22:40 pm
My guess is that he'll say he was bracing for protection and that no fine will be levied.


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: TonyB0D on December 12, 2010, 09:23:23 pm
While I would not mind seeing that.  I think it is a bit over the top. 

One or two game suspension plus a hefty fine ($15k -$25k). Which is the absolute maximum that would have occurred if he was a player instead of a coach.   

they can't fine him that much, he will lose his house.  a 5 figure fine for a guy who probably only makes 5 is rough.  he should b e banned tho


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: MikeO on December 12, 2010, 09:23:53 pm
My guess is that he'll say he was bracing for protection and that no fine will be levied.

Even on the JETS post game show they said the Jets should fire this guy.

I would be shocked if this guys is on the Jets sideline next week. IF he isn't fired by Tuesday I would also be surprised


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: Spider-Dan on December 12, 2010, 09:26:09 pm
Players are not held to the same standard as coaches.  Players are playing.

Players punch each other in football all the time, and at the absolute most, it merits a one-game suspension (usually far, far less than that).  Woody Hayes threw a punch at an opposing player and he was permanently out of a job.


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: MyGodWearsAHoodie on December 12, 2010, 09:29:13 pm
they can't fine him that much, he will lose his house.  a 5 figure fine for a guy who probably only makes 5 is rough.  he should b e banned tho

He should have thought about that before applying the hit.  I see banning a guy as worse than force him to give up a portion of his salary.  But if he would rather walk than have his salary docked, that's okay too.  I would not demand he fork over $20k in a check.  $500 per month until he paid it off would be a sufficient deterrent for future misbehavior by him or others.  


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: MikeO on December 12, 2010, 09:31:30 pm
I dont think a fine will even occure. I think the JETS with all of their drama over the Edwards DUI and the female reporter being harrassed by the team, won't want the NFL down their neck once again this season. And they will fire this guy ASAP.

The NFL will throw some petty fine at the Jets and this will be over. And I find it hard to believe another NFL team will hire this guy after today. So, we will see but I do think the Jets will make this go away quick and NOT have it be a distraction


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: TonyB0D on December 12, 2010, 09:33:50 pm
when did the play occur??


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: MikeO on December 12, 2010, 09:35:29 pm
After the game the Jets organization were saying no trip happened. Nothing happened.

Then when ESPN, NBC, CBS, FOX, and the NFL Network all were going nuts over it, they then changed their tune and said they will handle it. And the Jets PR guy was running around trying to find this Alosi character before he started talking to the press. And as he was about to give an interview (and probably come off like a jackass) the PR guy grabbed him and pulled him away.

The Jets are a a train-wreck right now. Total downard spiral.


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: MyGodWearsAHoodie on December 12, 2010, 09:37:01 pm
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/09000d5d81cdbb65/article/dolphins-call-for-league-to-investigate-alleged-tripping-incident


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: Stinger24 on December 12, 2010, 09:55:08 pm
Absolutely unacceptable for a coach on any staff to behave that way. He should be immediately terminated if not it just shows how classless the Jets organization is.


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: Landshark on December 12, 2010, 10:01:29 pm
I rememeber watching a similar incident on Not So Great Moments In Sports about the '54 Cotton Bowl.  Rice's Dick Meagle was headed for a TD when Alabama's Tommy Lewis leaped off the bench and tackled him.  Meagle was awarded the TD. 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eSteCSinjTs


That said, the '54 Cotton Bowl was a player vs player incident.  In this case, you have a coach tripping a player and hurting him.  That coach needs to be terminated immediately and permanently expelled from the league.


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: hordman on December 12, 2010, 10:06:08 pm
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/09000d5d81cdbb65/article/dolphins-call-for-league-to-investigate-alleged-tripping-incident

also in the NFL. com article

Outspoken Dolphins linebacker Channing Crowder had his own take on the play. "I wish they would have tripped me. I would have broken his leg."

there goes ass-clown again, all talk, no action.  I wish his off the field comments would match his on the field play, we'd have all-pro LB playing the Phins.

take a lesson from Dansby there Chowder, let your play do the talking.


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: MyGodWearsAHoodie on December 12, 2010, 10:10:14 pm
also in the NFL. com article

Outspoken Dolphins linebacker Channing Crowder had his own take on the play. "I wish they would have tripped me. I would have broken his leg."

there goes ass-clown again, all talk, no action.  I wish his off the field comments would match his on the field play, we'd have all-pro LB playing the Phins.

take a lesson from Dansby there Chowder, let your play do the talking.

He would fit in well with the Jets. 


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: Stinger24 on December 12, 2010, 10:11:42 pm
He would fit in well with the Jets. 

True


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: Orlando Rays on December 12, 2010, 10:36:43 pm
You know, I had no idea the player that was tripped was Nolan Carroll.

As in, the son of our Lieutenant Governor-elect.

That douchebag is really barking up the wrong tree now.


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: habfan5150 on December 12, 2010, 10:48:52 pm
Not that this will justify his actions, but did you notice that Carroll was way out of bounds on the play ?


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: Orlando Rays on December 12, 2010, 10:59:30 pm
It shouldn't matter. The fact of the matter is, a non-player of an NFL team tripped an opposing player intentionally. It doesn't matter where it happened.


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: Dave Gray on December 12, 2010, 11:21:21 pm
The guy apologized for the act, letting us know that it was intentional.  With this new news, I expect bad things for him.


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: MyGodWearsAHoodie on December 12, 2010, 11:29:53 pm
From his apology...

Quote

My conduct was inexcusable and unsportsmanlike and does not reflect what this organization stands for.


Sal, you got that half right.  It was inexcusable and unsportsmanlike.  The second half of that statement is false. 


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: Stinger24 on December 12, 2010, 11:38:35 pm
From his apology...

Sal, you got that half right.  It was inexcusable and unsportsmanlike.  The second half of that statement is false. 

Yes the second half is absolutely false


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: StL FinFan on December 12, 2010, 11:44:58 pm
They are talking about it on the post game show on NBC right now.  They are saying there should be "serious action" taken, but not elaborating if they think it will mean fined, suspended or terminated.  I guess it will depend on if they find it was intentional.


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: Pappy13 on December 12, 2010, 11:45:34 pm
Not that this will justify his actions, but did you notice that Carroll was way out of bounds on the play ?
He was knocked out of bounds by the Jets players and was trying to get back onto the field when he was tripped.


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: MyGodWearsAHoodie on December 12, 2010, 11:47:56 pm
They are talking about it on the post game show on NBC right now.  They are saying there should be "serious action" taken, but not elaborating if they think it will mean fined, suspended or terminated.  I guess it will depend on if they find it was intentional.

Quote

“I made a mistake that showed a total lapse in judgment. My conduct was inexcusable and unsportsmanlike and does not reflect what this organization stands for.   I spoke to Coach Sparano and Nolan Carroll to apologize before they took off. I have also apologized to Woody [Johnson], Mike [Tannebaum and Rex [Ryan.] I accept responsibility for my actions as well as any punishment that follows.”


He admits it was intentional.


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: Brian Fein on December 13, 2010, 01:20:37 am
Further proof that the Jets are cheating scumbags.  This a-hole should be fired immediately, and Nolan Carroll should be allowed one tackle on him.  Without pads.


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: Dolphster on December 13, 2010, 09:09:18 am
Can't even say that I was surprised that this doucher pulled a stunt like that.  The Jets organization and their fans have always been completely devoid of any class at all for as long as I can remember.  New Yorkers in general are barely literate, speak as if English is not their first language, and live their lives as greasy, shower-free, guidos.  So no big surprise when one of their staff does something like this.  Just serves as a nice reminder of why it is so fulfilling to hate the Jets.


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: Philly Fin Fan on December 13, 2010, 10:34:32 am
What really ticked me off is that this was several plays after the hit on Bess, after he called for a fair catch on a punt. That hit was not called, and then the refs did nothing on this play.

I had to sit there and think to myself- can the ref's give some sort of unsportsmanlike conduct call on the sidelines? As far as I know, they can. I've seen them give unsportsmanlike conduct flags to a coach for things a lot less serious than tripping a player. But they didn't. That really ticked me off.


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: MyGodWearsAHoodie on December 13, 2010, 10:38:48 am
^^^ I am pretty sure the ref didn't see the contract.  At least not well enough to see it was intention.  If the ref had the coach would have been ejected from the game. 

If something pretty serious is not done, I don't know how the league can ever say, "we consider player safety to be our highest priory" with a straight face?

Here is PFT's view....

Quote
1.  Jets, NFL face dilemma regarding Sal Alosi.

On December 29, 1978, Ohio State coach Woody Hayes lost his cool and punched Clemson defender Charlie Bauman after Bauman intercepted a pass during the Gator Bowl.  Hayes promptly lost his job.

On September 22, 1997, Steelers coach Bill Cowher wisely restrained himself from tackling Chris Hudson of the Jaguars after a blocked field goal attempt at the end of the game transformed a potential 24-23 win by Pittsburgh into a 30-21 defeat.  If Cowher hadn’t kept from reprising his playing days, who knows what would have happened to him?

Though Jets strength and conditioning coach Sal Alosi threw no punches on Sunday when Nolan Carroll of the Dolphins ran by him while covering a punt, Alosi likewise showed no restraint, succumbing to the moment of temptation occasioned by the opportunity to subtly slide a knee into Carroll’s leg.  Apparently oblivious to the fact that cameras were on and rolling, Alosi successfully tripped Carroll.

After the game, once it became clear that any explanations premised on the notion that the incident occurred accidentally or inadvertently would be met with scoffs and/or harrumphs, the Jets issued a statement from Alosi in which he accepted responsibility for his actions “as well as any punishment that follows.”

As Rodney Harrison of Football Night in America said in our weekly look at selected NFL topics, we’ll learn a lot about the Jets based on how they handle this.  In September, the franchise was criticized for allowing receiver Braylon Edwards to play only days after a DUI arrest.  In January, however, coach Rex Ryan was fined $50,000 for shooting a middle finger at Dolphins fans who were heckling him at an MMA event in South Florida, even though Ryan was on his on time and his team’s season was over.

The punishment, whatever it may be, needs to be severe.  The statement from Alosi, which surely was written and/or edited by the team, likely was intended to take some of the sting out of the situation, in the hopes of allowing the Jets to give the man who gave Carroll the Charlie Brown treatment something other than the Woody Hayes treatment.  That said, plenty of people (including Dolphins linebacker Karlos Dansby) will call for Alosi to be fired.

At a minimum, a suspension through the end of the 2010 season must be imposed.  Alosi crossed a line on Sunday, and a severe consequence is necessary to ensure that others who have the privilege of being on the sidelines won’t do the same thing.

What if it had been a photographer or a member of the media who had tripped Carroll?  Surely, that person would already have been fired.  At a minimum, that person never would be permitted to appear on an NFL sideline again.

So why should Alosi be?

Regardless of what happens, the players and their union will be watching.  At a time when players face stiff fines and possible suspensions for accidentally inflicting injury by inadvertently using their helmets while trying to tackle defenseless players, anyone who deliberately takes a cheap shot at a player should face at least that much scrutiny, if not a lot more.



Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: MyGodWearsAHoodie on December 13, 2010, 11:14:00 am
Comment from a Patriots board:

It a good thing that it was Sal's knee and not Rex Ryan's gut....otherwise Nolan would be on IR.   



Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: Philly Fin Fan on December 13, 2010, 11:59:36 am
take a lesson from Dansby there Chowder, let your play do the talking.

Dansby also commented on it, as did many other players. You can dislike Crowder, but in a situation like this, all the players are going to talk.


"He's just taking after the head coach, man. It all trickles downhill," Dansby said after the Dolphins' 10-6 win in East Rutherford, N.J. on Sunday. "That's how I look at it, it trickles downhill. The head coach, he opened a can of worms over there and now he's got to fix it."

http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/story/14437393/league-jets-reviewing-sideline-tripping-incident

Read several other Dansby quotes as well. Like I said, a lot of players are being vocal about this.


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: Pappy13 on December 13, 2010, 12:01:08 pm
I was actually quite happy to see that Carroll himself showed a lot of restraint and said he'd have to see it on tape before commenting.  Nolan just made me a believer.  Let your actions on the field do the talking.


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: MyGodWearsAHoodie on December 13, 2010, 01:43:51 pm
http://sports.espn.go.com/new-york/nfl/news/story?id=5913168

Make sure you vote in the poll of the day.....

Right now its

fire him 49
suspend him 39
move on 11.


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: Dave Gray on December 13, 2010, 01:59:27 pm
I chose "suspend him".  I think that he should be done for the season.  I think that what the guy did was completely bush-league, but it wasn't premeditated or anything.  He got caught in the moment.  It is absolutely inexcusable, but since no harm was done, I think the guy dodged a bullet.  Had Carol been injured, that's another story.

The guy apologized immediately (probably realizing that any other action would make him look even more foolish, but whatever) and has taken responsibility.  I think that suspension for the remained of the season is a fair punishment.


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: dolfan13 on December 13, 2010, 02:32:50 pm
^^^ i think that's probably the most appropriate way to look at it.

it's a totally douche move, even more magnified because it was from some spectator on the sidelines. hopefully this guy learns from this, and can put it behind him as a mistake that was out of character.


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: MyGodWearsAHoodie on December 13, 2010, 02:40:12 pm
The more I think about it,  the more I think this was organizational problem. 

1. Watch this video and then tell me that the organizational goal of the New York Jets special teams unit is field position and not the injury of opposing team players.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zYvmbPh49Jo&feature=related

2.  Look at how those guys are all lined up, right on the white line.  Hands in their pockets.  They look like they are a soccer team getting ready for a penalty kick on goal. 

3. I don't think this is the first time an opposing player has been injured or tripped up running down the Jets sideline.  I just think it is the first time the cause of the injury was captured on film.
 


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: CF DolFan on December 13, 2010, 02:41:09 pm
The guy was forced to admit it. He was denying it was purposely done and in fact was getting ready to go before tv cameras to say as much when a Jets official dragged him off to show him the video. They then wrote his apology. The guy should not get any credit for his apology or the fact Carol did not get hurt. Woody Hayes got booted for life for throwing a punch and this is no different.


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: dolfan13 on December 13, 2010, 02:47:53 pm
i heard the same thing from a couple of callers on the radio...

i mean i dunno... maybe im more forgiving as i have gotten older :)

i want to think that these guys are all human beings first, and aren't approaching things to purposefully injure unsuspecting players. maybe that is just a naive way of looking at things, but i can't believe this is a systemic approach.


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: Dave Gray on December 13, 2010, 02:53:01 pm
The guy should not get any credit for his apology or the fact Carol did not get hurt. Woody Hayes got booted for life for throwing a punch and this is no different.

I think this is very different.

First off, the fact that this is pro football vs. college football is a big, big deal.  I think that you have to have zero tolerance when dealing with students, because of the disparity in power (students have none), as well as the fact that they aren't being paid and it is literally the job of the school to protect them.  I don't think they're comparable for that alone.

Also, I don't think that the knee-out vs. a punch are the same either.  The knee was a result of circumstance.  Woody Hayes reacted out of anger with a intentionally violent act.  The knee was stupid and dangerous, but the intention was to slow the progress of the play (I assume), not to attack a player.

I am in no way defending the guy that put his knee out.  I'm outraged by it.  But I don't see it as the same ballpark as a coach punching an opposing student on the field of play.


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: Spider-Dan on December 13, 2010, 02:56:45 pm
I think another good point was made in the PFT article:

What if a reporter or photographer had done this?  They'd clearly be fired and/or banned from the sideline for life.

You cannot have bystanders cheap-shotting players during the game.  It's absolutely intolerable.


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: MyGodWearsAHoodie on December 13, 2010, 03:01:28 pm
I think another good point was made in the PFT article:

What if a reporter or photographer had done this?  They'd clearly be fired and/or banned from the sideline for life.

You cannot have bystanders cheap-shotting players during the game.  It's absolutely intolerable.

I think banning him for life from the sidelines would be appropriate.  If the Jets want to keep him employed, that is their business.  His job doesn't require him to actually be at games, just the weight room between games. 


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: StL FinFan on December 13, 2010, 03:04:07 pm
I just can't get that worked up over this.  He wasn't injured, the Dolphins won, and the Jets were shown as the classless frauds they are.  Doesn't get much better.


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: dolfan13 on December 13, 2010, 03:06:28 pm
not sure that simply banishment from the sidelines is any type of punishment. it's probably just a perk he gets as being an employee of the club.

im for serious punishment, meaning the deduction of pay via a suspension. im not for firing though, or any type of life banishment from his profession.


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: dolfan13 on December 13, 2010, 03:22:38 pm
wow... ok so now i am watching the replays a day removed on nfl network.

the second guy in the line after alosi throws his shoulder as well. i still hate to think it, but the more and more i watch this, the more it looks like a pre-meditated "formation" and set of acts.


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: Dolphster on December 13, 2010, 03:26:00 pm
I just can't get that worked up over this.  He wasn't injured, the Dolphins won, and the Jets were shown as the classless frauds they are.  Doesn't get much better.

I understand what you are saying.  But even though he wasn't injured.  He could have been.  Let's say Carroll landed wrong after being tripped and blew out his knee and it ended his career.  This douchebag's actions were the same either way.  Just the outcome would have been different.  You have to remember that these guys put food on their table because of what they can accomplish with their bodies.  If something happens to them in the normal course of play, then that just kind of comes with the territory.  But when some clown who isn't even a player does something that could potentially end someone's career, then we are talking a totally different level of activity going on.


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: StL FinFan on December 13, 2010, 03:27:10 pm
^ If an injury would have occurred, my response would have been completely different.


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: MyGodWearsAHoodie on December 13, 2010, 03:30:53 pm
Sal's Press conf:

http://www.newyorkjets.com/photos-and-videos/videos/1213-Sal-Alosi-Press-Conference/1516c2ed-58d3-48da-818c-6dd0b43565fe

He doesn't say much.  But I don't think the Jets would have had him give it if they were planning to fire him.  Ball is in the leagues court now. 


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: Dolphster on December 13, 2010, 03:37:30 pm
^ If an injury would have occurred, my response would have been completely different.

yep, I understand that it would be.  But I guess what I was trying to get at is that Alosi committed the same act whether an injury resulted or not.  Kind of like if a person is driving drunk, it is still a serious issue whether someone was injured from it or not.  The act was still the same, just the consequences of that were different.  Uggg, I'm having trouble putting into words exactly what I mean. 


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: StL FinFan on December 13, 2010, 04:26:14 pm
^ I feel you.  Just because no injury occurred, it does not make the act any less malicious.


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: MyGodWearsAHoodie on December 13, 2010, 04:41:18 pm
^ I feel you.  Just because no injury occurred, it does not make the act any less malicious.

I am not sure if drunk driving is a great analogy cause there you aren't trying to harm someone.  It is more negligent than intentional

This is more like murder vs. attempted murder.  Or kids throwing rocks trying to break a neighbors window and hitting the wall vs actually breaking the window. 

He did it on purpose.   


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: Dave Gray on December 13, 2010, 06:08:38 pm
He did it on purpose, yes.  But I don't believe that it was premeditated.  I think that matters.


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: MyGodWearsAHoodie on December 13, 2010, 06:18:10 pm
He did it on purpose, yes.  But I don't believe that it was premeditated.  I think that matters.

I dunno.  It might have premeditated.  It might even have been order from above. 


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: Frimp on December 13, 2010, 06:22:39 pm
He did it on purpose, yes.  But I don't believe that it was premeditated.  I think that matters.

Someone else touched on this earlier in the thread. Look in the video. The guy next to Alosi sticks his shoulder out. Not to mention, not one of the guys were watching the Jets player with the ball. They were all looking at Nolan. I think they saw alot of punts, and decided to do it the next time a guy got close enough.


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: Dave Gray on December 13, 2010, 06:33:07 pm
If that can be proven that these were orders from above (which I highly doubt), then not only should this guy be fired, but those that gave the orders should be given the boot, as well, all the way up the ladder.

But, I don't think that will happen, and I don't think that this was pre-planned.  At this point, from the evidence we have, it seems like conspiracy theory to suggest anything else.  If new evidence comes forward, I'll re-evaluate.


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: masterfins on December 13, 2010, 07:01:28 pm
Sad Situation.  I'm sure he's remorseful, and doesn't need to be banned for life.  However, I think a suspension for the remainder of the season, and a fine against the Jets is needed.  This is the atmosphere that Rex Ryan brings to the Jets, he was probably high fiving him behind closed doors.  I blame Ryan more than Alosi.


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: Dave Gray on December 13, 2010, 07:07:41 pm
One thing that looks bad for the Jets is that this isn't isolated.  This particular incident with this guy is isolated, but the Jets have had quite a few distractions this year and a whole lot of inaction in dealing with it.

I think that they need to take action internally.  I agree with Dansby when he says that this rolls downhill.  I believe that is true.  If high leadership doesn't demand excellence and professionalism, low-level cronies will pick up on that and act accordingly.  In order to cut this out, they need to make a statement.


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: StL FinFan on December 13, 2010, 07:14:36 pm
People on fb are saying he is suspended for the rest of the season and fined 25K by the Jets organization.  I am fine with that.  I wonder if the NFL will do anything on top of that.


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: MyGodWearsAHoodie on December 13, 2010, 07:17:35 pm
according to PFT Jets announced.  Unclear if imposed by league or the team. 


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: Brian Fein on December 13, 2010, 08:09:43 pm
Those 4 jokers were all lined up like wooden soldiers as close to the field as they could be.  Not one of them moved a muscle to get out of the way when a player came running at them.

It wouldn't surprise me one bit if fat Rex told them to stand there to clog the path.  I don't think he told them to trip someone, though.  Even he's not that sleazy (or is he?).


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: MyGodWearsAHoodie on December 13, 2010, 08:17:51 pm
^^^ not only that none of them ever looked at the ball carrier.  They were focused on Nolan.  They had a job to do. And they did it. 


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: Spider-Dan on December 13, 2010, 11:18:21 pm
If that can be proven that these were orders from above (which I highly doubt), then not only should this guy be fired, but those that gave the orders should be given the boot, as well, all the way up the ladder.

But, I don't think that will happen, and I don't think that this was pre-planned.  At this point, from the evidence we have, it seems like conspiracy theory to suggest anything else.  If new evidence comes forward, I'll re-evaluate.

http://espn.go.com/blog/afceast/post/_/id/23160/jets-deliver-strong-statement-on-sal-alosi

The NFL will not add to the sanctions, but ESPN's Chris Mortensen reported the league is looking into the incident to determine if Alosi and the Jets' inactive players were instructed to station themselves on the extreme edges of the sideline to inhibit Carroll from using that area to cover a punt.

As you can see in the still shot of the video below, Alosi and some inactive Jets players stood in a military-style phalanx, foot to foot, with their toes right up against the boundary. Alosi is stationed as close to the corner of the sideline box as allowable. That doesn't look like a coincidence.

Two punts before Alosi's trip, Dolphins safety Reshad Jones was flagged 15 yards for unsportsmanlike conduct for running out of bounds for about 30 yards. Players often get knocked out of bounds by defenders, but they must get back into the field of play as quickly as possible.

One of Alosi's game responsibilities is to make sure the Jets' sideline is clear, that their own players don't creep too close to the field. That person is called the get-back coach because he's often yelling at his players to do just that.

--

So the person whose responsibility it is to keep the players away from the field just happens to be standing at the exact maximum allowable distance towards the defender, with four other personnel standing shoulder-to-shoulder with him, toes on the sideline?

Get ready for this sh*t to blow up.  Alosi fell on the sword because of his overenthusiasm, but you can be sure that a) he's being taken care of under the table and b) this goes way deeper than just him.


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: MyGodWearsAHoodie on December 13, 2010, 11:43:12 pm
It makes no sense that Jets are the ones punishing him and not the league.  Had he tripped a Jets player during practice yeah then that is a team matter.  Just like I see Cable getting into a fight with another Oakland Raider a team matter not a league matter. 

But if Crowder grabs an opposing team players face mask does Sapano get to decide his punishment or set his fine?  Why should this be any different.  This employee attacked a player on the team of a division rival.  This is a league matter not a Jets team matter. 


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: Spider-Dan on December 13, 2010, 11:50:20 pm
The league would have stepped in if the Jets did not, but the Jets are certainly free to punish their own personnel for "conduct unbecoming."  If the league feels like the Jets' actions are harsh enough, they won't pile on.

If the Steelers chose to fine James Harrison $25k for a helmet-to-helmet on a QB, I doubt the NFL would add a fine to that, either.


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: MikeO on December 14, 2010, 07:11:45 am
I want to see the NFLPA step in and raise some hell now!

I think they should.


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: Dolphin-UK on December 14, 2010, 07:22:38 am
It's fairly obvious that the way they are lined up on the sideline and their actions in not "scattering" at the first sign of an approaching player as stated by one of their coaches was their practice is a deliberate attempt to interfere with the team on the field.

If as has been suggested this practice is not limited to use by the Jets to assist their punt team on the field the league needs to look into it for player/staff safety and ethical reasons. I have to say if I thought unkitted team members were trying to stop me doing my job as a gunner by forming awall to stop me running their way, I'd be sure to have an accidental high speed collision with them on the sideline.


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: Dolphster on December 14, 2010, 08:46:17 am
I am not sure if drunk driving is a great analogy cause there you aren't trying to harm someone.  It is more negligent than intentional

This is more like murder vs. attempted murder.  Or kids throwing rocks trying to break a neighbors window and hitting the wall vs actually breaking the window. 

He did it on purpose.   

It wasn't a particularly good analogy that I used.  That is why I wrote that I was having trouble putting into words what I was trying to say.  It made sense in my mind.    ;D


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: Brian Fein on December 14, 2010, 10:19:22 am
They weren't outside the rules, though.  Make a wall, but stay inside the lines.

If the NFL doesn't like it, they can move the lines.


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: Spider-Dan on December 14, 2010, 12:18:58 pm
So Brian, suppose NYJ is driving down the field trying to win the game.  Sanchez scrambles for a first and runs out of bounds.  Mike Nolan is standing at the precise boundary of the Dolphin sideline and blocks (think NBA foul of "blocking") Sanchez to the ground as he crosses that boundary.  Oh well, guess Sanchez should have stayed in bounds?

Give me a break.   This kind of stuff is prohibited by rule.  From page 92 of the 2010 NFL Rulebook:

Rule 13-1-8: Non-player personnel of a club (e.g., management personnel, coaches, trainers, equipment men) are prohibited from making unnecessary physical contact with or directing abusive, threatening, or insulting language or gestures at opponents, game officials, or representatives of the League.

Intentionally (<--- this part is important!) obstructing opposing players, even on your own sideline, clearly falls within the realm of making "unnecessary physical contact."


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: Brian Fein on December 14, 2010, 02:13:38 pm
I agree, but that's not what I was saying.  They have a line they are instructed to stay behind.  They have the right to stand behind such line and they are not required by NFL rules to move out of the way.  By the same token, if Nolan Carroll wanted to tackle their asses inside that line, he could do so as well.

They don't have to move out of the way, and they're allowed to stand there.  The line is crossed when they start sticking limbs out beyond the line.


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: Pappy13 on December 14, 2010, 02:38:49 pm
...they are not required by NFL rules to move out of the way.
Yes they are.  He just pointed out in the rules where they are.  They are prohibited from making uncessary contact with the players.  I'm pretty sure that everyone agrees Alosi made unnecessary contact with a player.  He could have moved out of the way and he should have moved out of the way.  He saw him coming.  He moved into his way when he saw him coming.  You can stand there, but if a player is coming, you are by rule to get out of his way, you can't just stand there and you certainly can't move into his path.  The only thing the line does is dileniate where you must stand to not be flagged for interference on the play.  If he would have crossed that line he would have been flagged for interference.  There was no interference, but that doesn't mean he did nothing wrong.  Just like how the NFL imposes fines after games for play on the field, they can certainly impose fines for things off the field as well.


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: Spider-Dan on December 14, 2010, 02:39:49 pm
I agree, but that's not what I was saying.  They have a line they are instructed to stay behind.  They have the right to stand behind such line and they are not required by NFL rules to move out of the way.
That's where you're wrong.  They ARE required by NFL rules NOT to intentionally stand in a location so as to cause "unnecessary physical contact".

They can stand anywhere in the box that they like, but they can't pick a location with the express purpose of interfering with opposing players.  Do you understand the distinction there?  Intent matters.

Quote
By the same token, if Nolan Carroll wanted to tackle their asses inside that line, he could do so as well.
Wrong again.  Nolan Carroll cannot tackle a coach, no matter where they are standing.  It is not his job to enforce the rules; that is the job of the officiating crew.


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: MyGodWearsAHoodie on December 14, 2010, 02:44:39 pm
That's where you're wrong.  They ARE required by NFL rules NOT to intentionally stand in a location so as to cause "unnecessary physical contact".

They can stand anywhere in the box that they like, but they can't pick a location with the purpose of interfering with opposing players.  Do you understand the distinction there?  Intent matters.

I think you are going too far with this.  The must stand behind the white line.  Purposefully standing on the whiteline  starting before the kick cause they know the Dolphins player like to run out of bounds is quite a bit different than purposefully getting in the way once the play is underway.   


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: Spider-Dan on December 14, 2010, 04:21:50 pm
Hoodie, what do you have to say about the situation I outlined earlier with Sanchez and Mike Nolan?

The team sideline box is not some sort of lawless DMZ where anything goes.


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: Brian Fein on December 14, 2010, 04:24:13 pm
Good luck proving that they stood there with the intent of harming the player.

They're allowed to stand in the box.  They were standing in the box.  They are not allowed to impede the player.

What if their back was turned toward the play and the player ran right into them??  Its not their fault for not moving.  It makes no difference what direction they are facing.  I don't see anything in the rule you posted that requires them to move out of the way.  Its the player's job to go around them.


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: MyGodWearsAHoodie on December 14, 2010, 04:29:05 pm
Hoodie, what do you have to say about the situation I outlined earlier with Sanchez and Mike Nolan?

The team sideline box is not some sort of lawless DMZ where anything goes.

Putting aside what Alosi actually did do.  I have no problem with "the wall"  Nolan was running where he is was not suppose to be running.  He had the power to avoid the wall.  So the wall being there to discourage him from going further past were he wasn't suppose to be wasn't really the problem.  However if a Jets player had pushed Nolan out of bounds and the wall did not try to avoid him, then that is a problem.  Them just standing there I don't have a problem with.   


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: Spider-Dan on December 14, 2010, 05:22:58 pm
Good luck proving that they stood there with the intent of harming the player.

They're allowed to stand in the box.  They were standing in the box.  They are not allowed to impede the player.
If they are repeatedly standing in the box, in the same formation, watching the gunner run into them without even attempting to move, then that does a pretty good job of proving their intent.  Particularly if they just happen to be there on, say, punts.

Quote
What if their back was turned toward the play and the player ran right into them??
What if Ray Lewis is trying to cover Gronkowski and he happens to collide with Wes Welker helmet-to-helmet when they both aren't looking?  I guess we can't possibly make any helmet-to-helmet rules, then!

If your back is turned toward the play and you aren't watching, that's probably a little different from a shoulder-to-shoulder phalanx of personnel standing with their toes on the borderline staring directly at a player (that's nowhere near the ball) while he's barreling toward them at full speed.

INTENT MATTERS.


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: Spider-Dan on December 14, 2010, 05:24:15 pm
Putting aside what Alosi actually did do.  I have no problem with "the wall"  Nolan was running where he is was not suppose to be running.  He had the power to avoid the wall.  So the wall being there to discourage him from going further past were he wasn't suppose to be wasn't really the problem.  However if a Jets player had pushed Nolan out of bounds and the wall did not try to avoid him, then that is a problem.  Them just standing there I don't have a problem with.
So if Sanchez voluntarily runs out of bounds, Sparano is 100% justified in bodychecking him the moment he crosses the plane of the sideline box?


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: MyGodWearsAHoodie on December 14, 2010, 05:34:08 pm
So if Sanchez voluntarily runs out of bounds, Sparano is 100% justified in bodychecking him the moment he crosses the plane of the sideline box?

No.  But Sparono is allowed to stand on the Dolphin's sideline at the white line at 1st down marker. What Alosi did was wrong.  The others were standing were they were allowed to be.  They did not make contact with the player. 


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: Brian Fein on December 14, 2010, 05:34:44 pm
Dude, I'm talking about guys just standing around.  Not body-checking, not kicking, punching, or helmet-to-helmet tackling.  Just standing.

No.  But Sparono is allowed to stand on the Dolphin's sideline at the white line at 1st down marker. What Alosi did was wrong.  The others were standing were they were allowed to be.  They did not make contact with the player. 
This is pretty much my point as well.


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: Pappy13 on December 14, 2010, 05:35:00 pm
I think you are going too far with this.  The must stand behind the white line.  Purposefully standing on the whiteline  starting before the kick cause they know the Dolphins player like to run out of bounds is quite a bit different than purposefully getting in the way once the play is underway.   
No, it's not.  Not if their intent is to hinder a player.  There is a rule that a player who is blocked out of bounds must get back in bounds as quickly as possible and if they are standing there trying to keep that player from getting back onto the field of play, then they are interfering with the play.  You can't use that rule to your advantage by having players/coaches intentionally try to keep you out of bounds.  They can stand there if they want, but if a player is pushed out of bounds, he is obligated to get back in bounds as quickly as possible and they are obligated to allow the player to get back onto the field of play.  The player can't simply run down the sidelines out of bounds and you can't try to prevent him from running back onto the field of play either.  It's a 2 way street.


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: Sunstroke on December 14, 2010, 05:36:32 pm

I just love the term "phalanx" being used for coaches standing on the sideline...  Give me some extra gravy on them taters, please! ;D



Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: Pappy13 on December 14, 2010, 05:41:10 pm
They're allowed to stand in the box.  They were standing in the box.  They are not allowed to impede the player.
The biggest problem with that logic in this particular example is that Alosi is actually the person who is supposed to be telling his players to "get back" when they could be in the way.  He was in fact the person designated to watch the gunner and let other players know they could be in the way and let them know they need to move.  So it's not simply a case of him not seeing the player, he was actually supposed to be watching for the gunner and moving people out of the way if need be.  It's clear in the video he had no intention of moving, nor getting anyone else out of the way.  The intent is crystal clear even if he didn't put his leg out.  He was trying to disrupt the play as were the rest of the players.  The only thing not known is whether or not they did it on their own or were instructed to do it.

http://sports.espn.go.com/new-york/nfl/news/story?id=5915776

"There was speculation that Alosi may have been instructed to form a human wall on the sideline, a show of force to deter the Dolphins' gunners. Early in the game, another gunner was penalized for running out of bounds by the Jets' bench.

A close examination of the TV replay shows Alosi, backup defensive tackle Marcus Dixon (inactive) and four others in Jets garb, side by side. Alosi, Dixon and an unidentified third person were almost in a wedge formation, their feet practically touching.

Curiously, none of them flinched as Carroll approached at full speed. Alosi leaned forward, extending his left knee as Carroll ran by. Carroll went flying and appeared to be hurt. He got up slowly, but returned to the game. Alosi is the Jets' "get-back" coach. In other words, it's his job to instruct the sideline personnel to stay a safe distance from the action.

Two coaches from teams outside the AFC East, the Jets' division, said such an alignment has been "coached" or "encouraged" by certain clubs. They did not specifically identify the Jets as a known culprit of such practice."


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: Spider-Dan on December 14, 2010, 06:10:51 pm
I also already quoted an article saying that the league is investigating whether "Alosi and the Jets' inactive players were instructed to station themselves on the extreme edges of the sideline to inhibit Carroll from using that area to cover a punt."  I am curious as to what Brian, Hoodie, et al think the league is investigating, exactly, if they believe that it's perfectly reasonable to intentionally try to impede players as long as they are out-of-bounds.

The rule is crystal clear: non-player personnel are required not to engage in unnecessary physical contact with players.  In any situation, a coach "blocking" a player headed for the sideline area (when he clearly sees him coming) instead of making a reasonable effort to get out of the way would be a violation of this rule.  But a formation of coaches intentionally positioning themselves so as to CREATE this situation?  What possible example could there be of a MORE blatant violation of this rule?


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: MyGodWearsAHoodie on December 14, 2010, 06:16:46 pm
^^^ sounds like they are more looking into if the rules need to change than if the Jets broke any rules.  Big difference. 


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: Sunstroke on December 14, 2010, 06:23:09 pm
^^^ Then I somewhat disagree with the sounds you're hearing... ;)

Key being that "Sounds like" and "Is" =  Big difference

If I were dropping a dollar on a bizarre NFL investigation prop bet, I'd bet that the NFL is probably looking at all facets of this situation, from the rule itself and how it's worded to the intent of coaching staffs in manipulating that rule. If I've learned anything about Goodell since he took over, I'd bet the NFL's response to the situation will be lukewarm...and slightly off target.



Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: Brian Fein on December 14, 2010, 06:52:20 pm
If they don't want people to stand there, then move the box.  Don't tell players "you can stand anywhere inside this line" and then point out instances where its not allowed.

If that's not what you want, move the line. 

Coaches are always going to push the envelope as far as they can to gain an advantage.  In the general case, ALL PLAYERS AND PERSONNEL can be standing anywhere they want inside the boundary.  If a player is running towards them, its their own prerogative to move or not.  Standing there is not against the rules, in general.  Again, I'm speaking IN GENERAL.  Clearly in this case, there was a breach, and the punishment has been dealt.


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: Dolphin-UK on December 14, 2010, 07:00:56 pm
I'm with Spider Dan on this one, as has been mentioned before the difference is intent.

Are the coaches/players allowed to stand there....yes.
Is the Gunner allowed to go out of bounds on a punt....yes, as long as he makes an effort to get back in bounds at the earliest oppurtunity.

The coaches/players are expected to get out of the way they don't have to that is one issue BUT....

The inactive players are allowed to stand there however, if they choose to do it only on punting downs and when the opposition gunner are being double teamed, then they are deliberately setting out to influence the ability fo a player on the field to their job, in so much as they are trying to confine the space with which the gunner can work in.

If those players disperse for normal plays then they are essentially using more than 11 players on a punt return team to block the gunners path. IMHO the league needs to clarify that, by either telling teams not to do it, by moving the box back from the sideline or to say that gunners cannot go out of bounds (i do find it odd that gunners can go out fo bounds to beat a block but the blockers aren't allowed to continue blocking out fo bounds)


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: Spider-Dan on December 14, 2010, 08:01:04 pm
If they don't want people to stand there, then move the box.  Don't tell players "you can stand anywhere inside this line" and then point out instances where its not allowed.

If that's not what you want, move the line.
Brian, do you or do you not agree that the specific rule that I quoted says that non-player personnel are prohibited from making unnecessary physical contact with players?  I'm not interested in discussing what you think the rules should be for people standing out-of-bounds, I'm interested in what they ARE.

You keep arguing about sidelines and boundaries, but that's irrelevant; coaches are not allowed to make unnecessary physical contact with opponents, anywhere, period.  Standing there and directly watching a player barrel at you full speed, while you make no attempt whatsoever to move, is making unnecessary physical contact.  Intentionally placing yourself in a position where such contact is likely to occur, then standing and watching it occur, is blatantly making unnecessary physical contact.  How can you argue otherwise with a straight face?


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: masterfins on December 14, 2010, 08:28:02 pm
I see both your points, but I think there is a bit of a gray area in the rules.  If the Jets players are standing still (not sticking out legs, hitting, or checking) when an opposing player runs into them, then its hard to say the Jet player made the unnecessary contact when they were the ones hit.  On the other hand the players did line up to slow down a player returning to the field, without an overt act.  This is the type of thing that you shouldn't have to make a rule about (like specifically saying in the rules you have to make an effort to move), just another example of Rex Ryan's lack of class.


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: MyGodWearsAHoodie on December 14, 2010, 08:29:45 pm
Brian, do you or do you not agree that the specific rule that I quoted says that non-player personnel are prohibited from making unnecessary physical contact with players?  I'm not interested in discussing what you think the rules should be for people standing out-of-bounds, I'm interested in what they ARE.

You keep arguing about sidelines and boundaries, but that's irrelevant; coaches are not allowed to make unnecessary physical contact with opponents, anywhere, period.  Standing there and directly watching a player barrel at you full speed, while you make no attempt whatsoever to move, is making unnecessary physical contact.  Intentionally placing yourself in a position where such contact is likely to occur, then standing and watching it occur, is blatantly making unnecessary physical contact.  How can you argue otherwise with a straight face?

The rules say that they can not make unnecessary physical contact with the plays.  We all agree that the one that did make unnecessary contact (Sal Alosi) violated the rules.  You are arguing that the 5 players that did NOT make contacts still made unnecessary contact.  Spider, how do you make unnecessary contract without making contact?


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: Spider-Dan on December 14, 2010, 10:17:16 pm
The same way they can eject a player for throwing a punch and missing?

I keep coming back to the same point over and over: intent matters.  If the Patriots set up cameras to tape opponents' practices, but the opponent never actually practiced in front of the cameras, and the league found out about it, do you think they would just say, "Oh well, no harm, no foul!"


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: MyGodWearsAHoodie on December 15, 2010, 08:32:01 am
A  family member of one of the Jets team members has stated it was done on purpose. 

http://www.palmbeachpost.com/sports/dolphins/ex-miami-dolphin-zach-thomas-says-dirty-deed-1122207.html


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: Pappy13 on December 15, 2010, 09:53:02 am
If they don't want people to stand there, then move the box.  Don't tell players "you can stand anywhere inside this line" and then point out instances where its not allowed.
Why not?  The box is intended to keep players not in the game from going anywhere they want, it's not intended to tell them they can do anything they want as long as they are inside the box.

In baseball theres coaches boxes at first and third base, however if a player comes into the box, the coach has to move out of the way of play.  Please tell me why this is a bad rule?  Why should we move the box just because one coach decided he wasn't going to move?  That's ridiculous.

It's the exact same situation in football.  The box merely keeps players not in the game from going all the way down the sideline or onto the field.  It doesn't prevent a player who is in the game from going into the box.  It happens and it's allowed.  Players not in the game don't have exclusive rights to the box.  Players in the game are allowed into that box as well and they have the right of way.


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: bsfins on December 15, 2010, 03:36:22 pm
I'm not sure if this got posted,and this thread and the Zach thread seem to be the same topic...
The Jets think it was orchstrated,and suspend him indefinitely...
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2010/football/nfl/12/15/sal-alosi-wall.ap/index.html?eref=sihp (http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2010/football/nfl/12/15/sal-alosi-wall.ap/index.html?eref=sihp)


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: Dave Gray on December 15, 2010, 04:06:22 pm
UPDATE FROM NFL LIVE:

The Jets have moved his suspension to "indefinitely" when new information came out that Alosi instructed players to stand on the line.  Alosi changed his story.  At first he said he didn't form a wall, now he's saying he did.

The Jets are denying any Rex Ryan or Westhoff involvement, though I don't know.

With this new information, that this was premeditated, I think that an outright firing is fair.


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: Pappy13 on December 15, 2010, 04:08:30 pm
With this new information, that this was premeditated, I think that an outright firing is fair.
I'm pretty sure he won't be back next year which is pretty much the same thing.


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: MyGodWearsAHoodie on December 15, 2010, 04:09:06 pm
Dave it gets better.  

Jets are now blaming the NEPs for Alosi tripping a Dolphin.

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/12/15/westhoff-accuses-patriots-of-building-sideline-wall-too/


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: Jim Gray on December 15, 2010, 04:10:40 pm
Wonder why they didn't just fire him?  

I love the speculation on some other forums that they can't fire him because Rex or Mike Westhoff was really behind it, and he will cover for them as long as he has a job.  Man, if that was true.........what a Christmas present for Dolphin fans.


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: Spider-Dan on December 15, 2010, 05:29:44 pm
The firestorm continues. 

Right now, Mike Westhoff is simultaneously claiming that:

a) he had no idea that this kind of thing was happening on his sideline EVERY GAME and he is shocked, shocked I say, to hear it

AND

b) New England and some other teams do it all the time, so what's the big deal, guys?

So we are to believe that he knew that other teams were doing this, but he knew absolutely nothing about his own guys doing it?

Burn, baby, burn.


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: MikeO on December 15, 2010, 05:33:11 pm
building a wall isn't against the rules. TRIPPING A GUY IS!!

In fact the teams that don't build a wall are stupid!!

This is the Jets problem they don't know when to shut up. The guy tripped a player. Suspend him like they did. Fine him like they did. Then shut the hell up about it and move on. They don't, they keep this losing battle going. It's a battle they won't and can't win


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: Dave Gray on December 15, 2010, 05:36:14 pm
It is against the rules.  Though you're allowed to stand there, intentionally making contact or impeding players is specifically against the rules.  Since that is the point of building a wall, it is de facto against the rules, as well.


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: MyGodWearsAHoodie on December 15, 2010, 05:37:38 pm
The firestorm continues. 

Right now, Mike Westhoff is simultaneously claiming that:

a) he had no idea that this kind of thing was happening on his sideline EVERY GAME and he is shocked, shocked I say, to hear it

AND

b) New England and some other teams do it all the time, so what's the big deal, guys?

So we are to believe that he knew that other teams were doing this, but he knew absolutely nothing about his own guys doing it?

Burn, baby, burn.

Also his accusation against NE is a bit interesting...he accuses the defense of lining up when the Patriots punt.  

They aren't building a wall.  They are getting ready to take the field.  I bet NE offense does the same thing when the other team punts.  


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: MikeO on December 15, 2010, 05:38:02 pm
letter of the law vs spirit of the law

Thats what this comes down to


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: Phishfan on December 15, 2010, 05:38:25 pm
I can't believe this story is carrying on so long.


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: Spider-Dan on December 15, 2010, 05:41:49 pm
Also his accusation against NE is a bit interesting...he accuses the defense of lining up when the Patriots punt. 

They aren't building a wall.  They are getting ready to take the field.  I bet NE offense does the same thing when the other team punts.
Building an Alosi Wall when your own team is punting is pointless, anyway.  There's no one to interfere with.


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: Spider-Dan on December 15, 2010, 05:43:38 pm
MikeO, if you take a swing at an official and miss, you will still be ejected and suspended for the attempt.

Trying to commit a foul is frequently the same as committing a foul.  Intent matters.


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: Brian Fein on December 15, 2010, 05:47:01 pm
If you build a wall and make contact, you're violating the rules.

If you build a wall so that a guy runs around you instead of thru you, there is no violation.  Its not the same as punching a ref.  Its just standing there.  No action.  No aggression.  No intent.  Just standing.

You can not prove intent based on location of standing if no actions are taken.


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: Dave Gray on December 15, 2010, 05:48:15 pm
^ I don't think that's true.

Read the rule that Spider Dan posted.

You have to make an attempt to get out of the way.


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: Pappy13 on December 15, 2010, 05:53:08 pm
If you build a wall so that a guy runs around you instead of thru you, there is no violation.
But if the guy tries to run thru your "wall" and runs into one of your players, that IS a violation and could be flagged.  So if you line up with the intention of NOT moving when a player is trying to run passed you are in fact begging for a flag.  I would instruct my gunners to purposely run into your "wall" to try to draw a flag.  Especially now when the officials will probably be watching for it.


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: MyGodWearsAHoodie on December 15, 2010, 05:58:00 pm
Secret Transcript between Rex Ryan and Mike Tannenbaum and Woody Johnson.  

MT: Rex, did you order the Green Wall?
WJ: You *don't* have to answer that question!
RR: I'll answer the question!
RR: You want answers?
MT: I think I'm entitled.
RR: *You want answers?*
MT: *I want the truth!*
RR: *You can't handle the truth!*
[pauses]
RR: Son, we live in a world that has walls, and those walls have to be guarded by men in green sweat pants. Who's gonna do it? You? You, Westhoff? I have a greater responsibility than you could possibly fathom. You weep for Nolan Carroll, and you curse the Jets. You have that luxury. You have the luxury of not knowing what I know. That Carroll's injury, while tragic, probably saved yards. And my fat ass, while grotesque and incomprehensible to you, wins games.  And there is no fucking way we can win a game with Sanchez as the QB without cheating. You don't want the truth because deep down in places you don't talk about at parties, you want me to order the green wall, you need me to order the green wall. We use words like zerbra, 16, left. We use these words as the backbone of a life spent defending something. You use them as a punchline. I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to a man who rises and sleeps under the blanket of the cheating I do, and then questions the manner in which I cheat. I would rather you just said thank you, and went on your way, Otherwise, I suggest you put on some green sweat pants and stand a post. Either way, I don't give a damn what you think you are entitled to.
MT: Did you order the Green Wall?
RR: I did the job I...
MT: *Did you order the Green Wall?*
RR: *You're Goddamn right I did!*


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: MyGodWearsAHoodie on December 15, 2010, 06:00:22 pm
Building an Alosi Wall when your own team is punting is pointless, anyway.  There's no one to interfere with.

That is when they did build the wall.  To interfere with the gunner.  Not the returner. 


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: Pappy13 on December 15, 2010, 06:06:03 pm
OMG, too freaking funny.  Do you mind if I pass this on?  Hell, I don't give a damn if you do or don't, I'm passing it on. LOL


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: fyo on December 15, 2010, 06:07:04 pm
Good one, Hoodie.


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: MyGodWearsAHoodie on December 15, 2010, 06:10:20 pm
OMG, too freaking funny.  Do you mind if I pass this on?  Hell, I don't give a damn if you do or don't, I'm passing it on. LOL

Go for it. 


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: MikeO on December 15, 2010, 06:28:33 pm
If you build a wall and make contact, you're violating the rules.

If you build a wall so that a guy runs around you instead of thru you, there is no violation.  Its not the same as punching a ref.  Its just standing there.  No action.  No aggression.  No intent.  Just standing.

You can not prove intent based on location of standing if no actions are taken.

Thank you! You are exactly 100% correct!


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: Dave Gray on December 15, 2010, 06:32:45 pm
Quote
You cannot blame intent based on location of standing

True, not solely, at least.  However, this is coupled with action (the knee), which led to the investigation, where it was revealed that this coach ordered this formation, for what is assumed by all to be intended to interfere with the gunner.

Had there been no knee, we wouldn't be talking about this, because nobody would've noticed.  It just happened to shed light on a bigger problem, that the coach (and maybe more than just him) actively attempted to interfere with a player during a play, which is specifically against the rules.


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: Spider-Dan on December 15, 2010, 06:49:42 pm
That is when they did build the wall.  To interfere with the gunner.  Not the returner. 
The Jets built their wall(s) when Miami punted.  I'm not sure I get what you're driving at.


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: Spider-Dan on December 15, 2010, 06:52:16 pm
You can not prove intent based on location of standing if no actions are taken.
When you are staring at an opponent running at you at full speed, and you make no attempt whatsoever to get out of the way, that shows your intent.

Furthermore, as explained by Mike Golic, Alosi's particular wall was breaking the rules, anyway.  There are two lines in the sideline box, one for coaches only, and one (further back) for players and coaches.  Alosi's wall (which consisted of S&C coach Alosi and 5 inactive players) was in the coaches-only section of the sideline.  It's a clear violation.

In any case, I don't think Alosi is going to be fired, as the Jets don't want him rolling over on Westhoff and, ultimately, Rex Ryan.  Look for Alosi to "resign" within the week, which should leave him with a nice, fat, and undisclosed going-away present to make sure he doesn't give any interviews.


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: Spider-Dan on December 15, 2010, 07:12:01 pm
Upon further reflection, I partially see Brian's point in that there would be no flag thrown during a game for forming a wall until an opponent actually ran into it.

However, that says nothing about whether the league would drop a piano on you AFTER the game, which (now) they almost certainly would.


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: MikeO on December 15, 2010, 10:27:14 pm
Im sure the competition committe will look into these tactics this offseason and I expect some minor rule change with this before next season.


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: masterfins on December 15, 2010, 10:27:20 pm
Secret Transcript between Rex Ryan and Mike Tannenbaum and Woody Johnson.
  
RR: *You're Goddamn right I did!*

Damn that's funny Hoodie!!


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: masterfins on December 15, 2010, 10:34:29 pm
This story is like the Christmas gift that just keeps on giving.  Like most stupid acts the cover up that follows turns out to be worse than the actual initial action.  After the Jets fail to make the playoffs they will look back upon the loss to the Pats and this stupid trip, and lament.  For the next couple years every time the Fins play the Jets they will replay this trip clip, and hopefully it will add a little distraction to their play in the game.


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: Pappy13 on December 17, 2010, 10:33:54 am
They weren't outside the rules, though.  Make a wall, but stay inside the lines.

If the NFL doesn't like it, they can move the lines.
Looks like you have your wish.  The league sent a memo to all the teams detailing the rules regarding the sideline and only coaches and "a small amount of situation substitution players immediately ready to be sent into the game" are allowed in that first box just outside the white border that seperates the field of play.  There were at least 5 inactive players in that box.  Since they were inactive there's no way they could have been situation substituion players.  Only Alosi himself was within the rules by standing there.  All those inactive players should have been behind a solid yellow line that is 6 feet further back.  What's worse is that each team must designate a "getback" coach that is responsible for enforcing these rules.  Alosi is that coach for the Jets, so although he was within the rules by standing there, he was responsible for making sure that those inactive players were not standing there.  Not only did he fail to move them, he's admitted he told them to stand there.  They were outside the rules just by standing there.

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/09000d5d81cf665f/article/nfl-reiterates-sideline-rules-restrictions-in-memo-sent-to-teams?module=HP_headlines


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: MyGodWearsAHoodie on December 17, 2010, 11:08:13 am
It keeps getting better......

Quote

The league is checking into whether Westhoff violated a league rule by publicly calling out the Patriots. A 2008 league memo from commissioner Roger Goodell, printed in the San Francisco Chronicle and brought to light Thursday by ESPNBoston.com, warned every team that making false claims against other clubs could result in penalties.
ion PollCenter

The memo read: "Any club or individual reporting a violation is expected to do so in good faith, to have a reasonable basis for believing a violation occurred, and to produce (or to identify) evidence to substantiate the claim. In the event I determine that a claim is made in bad faith, is frivolous or that the club or person making the complaint is unable to produce evidence to support the charge, I will impose appropriate sanctions."



Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: MyGodWearsAHoodie on December 17, 2010, 02:21:53 pm
This is an excellent break down of Alosi's presser


http://www.newyorkshockexchange.com/content/view/313/37/


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: Spider-Dan on December 17, 2010, 03:17:42 pm
The ball continues to roll:

NFL reviewing Jets for Tripgate (http://sports.espn.go.com/boston/nfl/news/story?id=5928044), ESPN Boston

FLORHAM PARK, N.J. -- Tripgate isn't over for the New York Jets, who could be subject to sanctions by the NFL for using inactive players in an illegal wall and publicly accusing the New England Patriots of the same tactic.

"All of these matters are under review," league spokesman Greg Aiello said Thursday night in an e-mail to ESPNNewYork.com, responding to specific questions about the team's use of the wall and the Patriots-related remarks by special-teams coordinator Mike Westhoff.

A league representative is expected to meet with Jets officials as part of the investigation, and that meeting may occur as soon as Friday.

The controversy stems from Sal Alosi, the Jets' strength and conditioning coach, tripping Miami Dolphins player Nolan Carroll in Sunday's game at the New Meadowlands Stadium.

The Jets suspended Alosi for the remainder of the season without pay, but they increased the penalty to an indefinite suspension after determining Alosi instructed five inactive players to stand shoulder-to-shoulder along the sideline. The wall formation was designed to act as a deterrent to Carroll, the Dolphins' gunner on punt coverage.

The NFL sent a letter to the 32 teams Thursday reminding them of the rules and restrictions for the bench area and sidelines.

Ray Anderson, the league's executive vice president for football operations, emphasized the responsibilities placed on each team to appoint a "get-back coach" to ensure that players, coaches and other staff are in compliance with league rules.

Both head coach Rex Ryan and Westhoff said they had no knowledge of the wall until they reviewed the tape, claiming Alosi acted alone. But Westhoff may have inflamed the matter Wednesday, telling Chicago sports radio station ESPN 1000's "Waddle and Silvy Show" that the Patriots also have used it.

The league is checking into whether Westhoff violated a league rule by publicly calling out the Patriots. A 2008 league memo from commissioner Roger Goodell, printed in the San Francisco Chronicle and brought to light Thursday by ESPNBoston.com, warned every team that making false claims against other clubs could result in penalties.

The memo read: "Any club or individual reporting a violation is expected to do so in good faith, to have a reasonable basis for believing a violation occurred, and to produce (or to identify) evidence to substantiate the claim. In the event I determine that a claim is made in bad faith, is frivolous or that the club or person making the complaint is unable to produce evidence to support the charge, I will impose appropriate sanctions."

A Jets spokesman deferred to the league for comment.

Westhoff, in his 28th season as an NFL assistant, spoke to the Chicago radio station on the same day the Jets announced they had discovered "new information" on the Alosi matter -- information that he had organized the wall. He was part of that formation and extended his left knee as Carroll sprinted by.

"If you watch carefully, there is a pretty good team up north that lines up their whole defense when they do it, so it's something that just kind of happened," Westhoff told the radio station, confirming that he meant the Patriots.

Later in the day, addressing reporters at the Jets' facility, Westhoff said, "I'm not accusing the Patriots of doing something wrong. Maybe they're doing something smart. That's up to you. Just watch the tape. You tell me. I know one thing, I don't teach it."

Patriots coach Bill Belichick doesn't meet with the media on Thursdays and was unavailable to comment.

Presumably, the league will investigate whether Alosi acted alone or whether he was instructed to organize the wall.

Ryan's old boss, Brian Billick thinks there's no way Ryan didn't no about the wall.

"Of course Rex knew about this," Billick, an NFL of FOX analyst, said Thursday on ESPN's "Mike and Mike in the Morning" radio show. "Players crowding the sideline, a gunner running down the sideline, has always been an issue, and I think what you're going to see with the league is the proverbial, 'We have a rule in place, it is going to be enforced.'"

One of the Jets inactive players, tight end Jeff Cumberland, said Alosi had been instructing them from the start of the season to form the wall on punts.

Jets GM Mike Tannenbaum said Wednesday he welcomed a league review.

"The league is going to look into this, as well they should," he said.

Tannenbaum also said he'd meet with Ryan and owner Woody Johnson for "a full and complete review of the facts." He didn't expect it to take long to determine Alosi's fate.

Rich Cimini covers the Jets for ESPNNewYork.com. You can follow him on Twitter. Information from The Associated Press was used in this report.


--

So now outside of Alosi's trip (which is already a fait accompli), we have two potential sanctions for the Jets organization:

1) a Jets coach instructing inactive players to stand in a restricted area
2) a Jets coach making an accusation against another NFL team without providing evidence

If both of those stick, I think we could see the Jets lose a draft pick.  Keep hope alive!

edit: There's also a third option on the table.  So far, Rex and Westhoff have been pleading ignorance of the Alosi wall.  If it turns out that they had knowledge of it and attempted to cover it up, Goodell will detonate the Jets.  But for now, that's a pie-in-the-sky, cupcakes-and-rainbows best-case-scenario that's just too delicious to imagine.  So I'm not getting my hopes up yet.


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: MyGodWearsAHoodie on December 17, 2010, 03:29:04 pm


--

So now outside of Alosi's trip (which is already a fait accompli), we have two potential sanctions for the Jets organization:

1) a Jets coach instructing inactive players to stand in a restricted area
2) a Jets coach making an accusation against another NFL team without providing evidence

If both of those stick, I think we could see the Jets lose a draft pick.  Keep hope alive!

You missed one.  Alosi was the "get back coach" for the Jets.  The Ryan and Westoff have no idea why players would be listening to Alosi regarding where to stand.  BULLSHIT.  You told those players  that they need to listen to Alosi regarding where to stand.

Lying about what happened and the cover up is always worse than the actual deed. 

And keep in mind in Camaragate, BB never lied about anything factual.  His entire defense was as he read the memo what he was doing was legal and he should have gotten clarification.  We  can disagree if that is BS or not.  But he never attempted a cover up or lied about what he instructed others to do.  The guy with the camera was not suspended by the Patriots nor fined.  The man on the top took full responsibility.   

3. Making factual lies about Alosi's responsibilities. 

 


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: Spider-Dan on December 17, 2010, 04:28:58 pm
You missed one.  Alosi was the "get back coach" for the Jets.  The Ryan and Westoff have no idea why players would be listening to Alosi regarding where to stand.  BULLSHIT.  You told those players  that they need to listen to Alosi regarding where to stand.
Although I had already amended my post to include the lying option, I think you micharacterize Rex and Westhoff's position.  They are not saying that they don't know why the players would be listening to a coach (which is a transparently dumb claim to make); they are saying that they were paying no attention to the nature of that coach's instructions.


Title: Re: Sal "Loser" Alosi
Post by: MikeO on December 19, 2010, 12:59:29 pm
Marino on CBS defending Westoff was funny. He looked like he was about to cry when Boomer called Westoff is a liar (not in those exact words)

It was odd seeing a Dolphins QB defend a Jets coach. And seeing a Jets QB ripping the Jets coaches!