|
Title: Hard Knocks 2013 Post by: MikeO on January 11, 2013, 06:44:33 pm Early Rumor is BUFFALO will do it. But of course that might change.
Title: Re: Hard Knocks 2013 Post by: Landshark on January 13, 2013, 08:25:11 pm Early Rumor is BUFFALO will do it. But of course that might change. I'd love to see that Title: Re: Hard Knocks 2013 Post by: MyGodWearsAHoodie on January 14, 2013, 10:24:52 am I know one team that most certainly won't be doing it --- NEP.
Title: Re: Hard Knocks 2013 Post by: CF DolFan on January 14, 2013, 10:26:47 am How is it that they seem to be working their way through the AFC East.
How many of you can even remember when the AFC East was a tough division if ever? It's been forever. Title: Re: Hard Knocks 2013 Post by: Brian Fein on January 14, 2013, 10:38:24 am I think the Dolphins would do it again, if HBO wanted to.
I don't think I have any interest in seeing the goings-on of Bills' camp. Title: Re: Hard Knocks 2013 Post by: MyGodWearsAHoodie on January 14, 2013, 11:01:01 am How many of you can even remember when the AFC East was a tough division if ever? It's been forever. I remember when almost every year it would come down to Bills vs. Dolphins. At one time Kelly vs. Marino was as anticipated as much as Peyton vs. Brady is today. Title: Re: Hard Knocks 2013 Post by: EKnight on January 14, 2013, 11:15:09 am I remember when almost every year it would come down to Bills vs. Dolphins. At one time Kelly vs. Marino was as anticipated as much as Peyton vs. Brady is today. It was also an AFCE foe that knocked Marino's '85 team out of the playoffs wasn't it? -EK Title: Re: Hard Knocks 2013 Post by: MyGodWearsAHoodie on January 14, 2013, 01:26:56 pm It was also an AFCE foe that knocked Marino's '85 team out of the playoffs wasn't it? -EK Yeah, but in the 80's NEP making the playoffs was an abboration. Title: Re: Hard Knocks 2013 Post by: EKnight on January 14, 2013, 02:10:40 pm The discussion was if the AFCE was competitive; during the 80s the Pats had a losing record only twice. That's competitive, IMO. -EK
|