Title: Danny Watkins Post by: MikeO on October 09, 2013, 07:48:27 am Hearing on the local radio shows this morning from the reporters that he is "close" to having the playbook down and might be the new right guard after the BYE week.
Title: Re: Danny Watkins Post by: Landshark on October 09, 2013, 01:11:56 pm On a team known for major busts in the third round, John Jerry is one of the biggest
Title: Re: Danny Watkins Post by: Brian Fein on October 09, 2013, 02:52:12 pm A team known for major busts in the third round?
Did NFL Network have a Top 10 episode lately entitled "Third round bust teams" and the Dolphins were number 1? Do people sit around the water cooler at your "school" talking about teams with the most third round busts? "...and when you say Miami, you're talkin' third round busts." I give up... Title: Re: Danny Watkins Post by: Landshark on October 09, 2013, 03:19:29 pm A team known for major busts in the third round? Did NFL Network have a Top 10 episode lately entitled "Third round bust teams" and the Dolphins were number 1? Do people sit around the water cooler at your "school" talking about teams with the most third round busts? "...and when you say Miami, you're talkin' third round busts." I give up... Look at the track record of second and third round picks by this team in the past 10 years. Nuff said Title: Re: Danny Watkins Post by: CF DolFan on October 09, 2013, 03:56:15 pm This is our last three years of drafts. Not any game changers except Tannehill and I'm will to bet our offensive coordinator and coach had more to do with that. I'd like to think Jordon will be too but I, like many others, have to wonder why he still isn't playing with all of the injuries.
2010 Austin Spitler LB 2010 Chris McCoy DE 2010 Reshad Jones DB 2010 Nolan Carroll DB 2010 A.J. Edds LB 2010 John Jerry T 2010 Koa Misi LB 2010 Jared Odrick DE 2011 Jimmy Wilson DB 2011 Frank Kearse DT 2011 Charles Clay TE 2011 Clyde Gates WR 2011 Daniel Thomas RB 2011 Mike Pouncey OL 2012 Rishard Matthews WR 2012 Kheeston Randall DT 2012 B.J. Cunningham 2012 Josh Kaddu LB 2012 Lamar Miller RB 2012 Egnew TE 2012 Olivier Vernon DE 2012 Jonathan Martin T 2012 Ryan Tannehill QB 2013 Don Jones SS 2013 Caleb Sturgis K 2013 Mike Gillislee RB 2013 Dion Sims TE 2013 Jelani Jenkins OLB 2013 Will Davis CB 2013 Dallas Thomas T 2013 Jamar Taylor CB 2013 Dion Jordan DE Title: Re: Danny Watkins Post by: Spider-Dan on October 09, 2013, 04:09:21 pm On a team known for major busts in the third round, John Jerry is one of the biggest Look at the track record of second and third round picks by this team in the past 10 years. Nuff said Wait, if the team is "known for major busts in the third round," why are we now looking at the track record of second round picks? The goalposts, they are a-movin'.Not sure why you would evaluate the current front office based on Saban or Wanny's third-round picks, but Ireland has picked up two very solid players (Kendall Langford and Olivier Vernon) in the third round, vs. three bad players (Jerry, Egnew, and Patrick Turner). I presume you will agree that the jury is still out on the players picked up this year. Title: Re: Danny Watkins Post by: EKnight on October 09, 2013, 04:26:29 pm Since the thread has come to this topic (busts), I have to ask- isn't Watkins considered an absolute bust, which is why he was cut by Philly to start with? I'm not as familiar with him as you guys, but how is this an upgrade at G? -EK
Title: Re: Danny Watkins Post by: MyGodWearsAHoodie on October 09, 2013, 04:52:16 pm Did NFL Network have a Top 10 episode lately entitled "Third round bust teams" and the Dolphins were number 1? I really enjoyed ESPN's hour long special on the top 25 7th round draft bust of all time. :D :D :D I am really looking forward to next week's show, "UDFA's that failed to live up to expectations" Title: Re: Danny Watkins Post by: Brian Fein on October 09, 2013, 05:21:04 pm I just don't think any team is "known for" any level of draft busts, with the exception, MAYBE of the Lions and their 1st round WR tear thanks to Matt Millen.
I've never thought to myself "gee, this team is good but they sure did have a bunch of busts in the third round a few years ago." Its ridiculous. You should re-evaluate the words "known for" and reconsider using them. Title: Re: Danny Watkins Post by: pondwater on October 09, 2013, 06:33:50 pm Hearing on the local radio shows this morning from the reporters that he is "close" to having the playbook down and might be the new right guard after the BYE week. They really need to do something to address the problem before the next game. Title: Re: Danny Watkins Post by: Brian Fein on October 10, 2013, 10:37:29 am The "problem" can be fixed by play calling. How do you slow down a blitz? Screen passes. How many called screen passes does anyone remember seeing the first 5 games?
Anyone remember the AFC Championship game in the early 90's where Thurman Thomas and the Bills killed us by running screens almost every play? It was 20 years ago, but the strategy remains the same. You want to take the heat off Tannehill, you have to let Miller sneak out behind them and then toss it to him. Or you have to let Tannehill scramble with designed runs or options. Title: Re: Danny Watkins Post by: Cathal on October 10, 2013, 11:23:02 am ^^^ The people calling the plays are too inept to see stuff that even casual fans know they should call. :'(
Title: Re: Danny Watkins Post by: MikeO on October 15, 2013, 03:19:22 pm No changes to the o-line this week. The same 5 guys will start and Philbin is hitching his wagon to this group of 5. But Mike Sherman in the media singled out Clabo saying if he doesn't improve he will lose his job. Interesting as Clabo was the only person singled out and called out by name.
ESPN ran a piece saying only Martin and Pouncey are safe as Incognito, Clabo, and Jerry are UFA at seasons end and none will probably be back. And it was pointed out that Miami is running a zone blocking scheme and 4/5 of the starting o-line is better at man blocking not zone. Title: Re: Danny Watkins Post by: fyo on October 16, 2013, 05:28:52 pm ESPN ran a piece saying only Martin and Pouncey are safe as Incognito, Clabo, and Jerry are UFA at seasons end and none will probably be back. And it was pointed out that Miami is running a zone blocking scheme and 4/5 of the starting o-line is better at man blocking not zone. I don't know if Pouncy is the one who's better at zone blocking, but he's certainly done a great job so far. Incognito has also been solid. Not surprising that Clabo was singled out since he's been by far the worst this season. Hopefully, the guys up front will get a better grasp of the zone blocking scheme as the season progresses. Title: Re: Danny Watkins Post by: mecadonzilla on October 16, 2013, 10:29:34 pm If this line could just pass block, I'd be ecstatic. I'll worry about who can do what if they can just keep Tanny upright. Because Jerry and Clabo are so completely awful at everything this season, I have very low hopes on this front.
Title: Re: Danny Watkins Post by: CF DolFan on October 17, 2013, 08:39:38 am If this line could just pass block, I'd be ecstatic. I'll worry about who can do what if they can just keep Tanny upright. Because Jerry and Clabo are so completely awful at everything this season, I have very low hopes on this front. It's amazing how much better they would be at pass blocking if we could run the ball. Title: Re: Danny Watkins Post by: MikeO on October 17, 2013, 10:03:06 am It's amazing how much better they would be at pass blocking if we could run the ball. That's on Sherman as we don't attempt to run the ball enough Title: Re: Danny Watkins Post by: Phishfan on October 17, 2013, 10:37:51 am ^^^ Or maybe on Philbin for pushing the passing game. Wasn't Green bay a pass happy team when he was the OC as well?
Title: Re: Danny Watkins Post by: EKnight on October 17, 2013, 10:54:01 am How much of that is because of the talent on the field in GB, though? If you have Rodgers at QB, I don't believe it's a stretch of logic to be a pass happy team. -EK
Title: Re: Danny Watkins Post by: MyGodWearsAHoodie on October 17, 2013, 11:05:25 am How much of that is because of the talent on the field in GB, though? If you have Rodgers at QB, I don't believe it's a stretch of logic to be a pass happy team. -EK Possibly. If I was a coach I would pass more if I had a QB like Rodgers, Brady or Peyton. I would run more if I had an RB like LT or AP. If my RB and QB was equally talented (or untalented) I would be more balanced. The Dolphins don't have a superstar at either position, a balanced approach makes the most sense. Of course if you constantly playing from behind, you need to throw more. If you have a comfortable lead -- run more. Title: Re: Danny Watkins Post by: Brian Fein on October 17, 2013, 11:40:28 am ^^ I'd argue that Tannehill is more effective right now than Miller/Thomas, so passing makes sense. But, in absence of a running game, short outlet passes are a necessity. Haven't seen any of that either. Need to mix it up more.
Title: Re: Danny Watkins Post by: MyGodWearsAHoodie on October 17, 2013, 11:44:02 am ^^ I'd argue that Tannehill is more effective right now than Miller/Thomas, so passing makes sense. But, in absence of a running game, short outlet passes are a necessity. Haven't seen any of that either. Need to mix it up more. Tannehill might be a bit more effective than your running backs. But it is not the delta you have in Greenbay, NE, etc. Title: Re: Danny Watkins Post by: MikeO on November 02, 2013, 10:31:30 am How much does Danny Watkins suck that he can't even be active for gamedays with our piss poor o-line? Seriously. He has been here a month now so it can't be not knowing the playbook.
|