Title: Fins Draft Parker at #14 Post by: MikeO on April 30, 2015, 09:39:00 pm Big-time get for the Fins. He compares well to AJ Green. Great weapon. Exactly what the Fins needed!
Title: Re: Fins Draft Parker at #14 Post by: Sunstroke on April 30, 2015, 09:46:26 pm An excellent pick for Miami...and a player on the short list of guys I was hoping that SF would get in round one. And SF trades down a few picks with San Diego. We give up #15, and get #17, plus a 4th rounder this year and a 5th rounder next year. Title: Re: Fins Draft Parker at #14 Post by: MikeO on April 30, 2015, 09:48:42 pm An excellent pick for Miami...and a player on the short list of guys I was hoping that SF would get in round one. And SF trades down a few picks with San Diego. We give up #15, and get #17, plus a 4th rounder this year and a 5th rounder next year. SF just made a good trade. They will get Kevin Johnson probably or Dupree at LB Title: Re: Fins Draft Parker at #14 Post by: Pappy13 on April 30, 2015, 09:50:03 pm Makes sense. Give Tannehill plenty of weapons. Offense has a young and talented nucleus of players.
Tannehill Miller Landry Parker Stills Cameron Still need some offensive lineman, but the skill positions are very solid. Although I was kinda hoping for Kevin Johnson. Title: Re: Fins Draft Parker at #14 Post by: masterfins on April 30, 2015, 09:54:39 pm Jeez, on paper Miami has a fantastic receiving core; just hope the team stays healthy this year.
Title: Re: Fins Draft Parker at #14 Post by: mecadonzilla on April 30, 2015, 09:55:21 pm I am absolutely thrilled with this pick.
Title: Re: Fins Draft Parker at #14 Post by: MikeO on April 30, 2015, 09:55:28 pm Parker has had 3 drops in 2 years.
Miami also has their WR's locked up for years to come. Parker locked up for 5 more years Landry locked up for 4 more years Stills locked up for 3 more years WR issue solved for a while! Title: Re: Fins Draft Parker at #14 Post by: masterfins on April 30, 2015, 09:58:51 pm And SF trades down a few picks with San Diego. We give up #15, and get #17, plus a 4th rounder this year and a 5th rounder next year. Seems like a dumb move by the Chargers to give up a 4th & 5th, just to move ahead of the Texans to draft a RB. Title: Re: Fins Draft Parker at #14 Post by: MikeO on April 30, 2015, 10:00:23 pm Seems like a dumb move by the Chargers to give up a 4th & 5th, just to move ahead of the Texans to draft a RB. Houston wanted a RB according to many sources though Title: Re: Fins Draft Parker at #14 Post by: Sunstroke on April 30, 2015, 10:02:07 pm ...and just like that, my night is ruined. The one player I prayed that SF would NOT take was Arik Armstead. A DE who has zero pass rush skills and didn't show any ability to rack up tackles in the run game at Oregon. Sure, he's tall as shit, but this isn't a pick up hoops game at the local rec center, this is the NFL, where you need to produce.
Fuck me sideways... Title: Re: Fins Draft Parker at #14 Post by: Thundergod on April 30, 2015, 10:02:40 pm Outfreakingstanding!
Title: Re: Fins Draft Parker at #14 Post by: MikeO on April 30, 2015, 10:04:17 pm ...and just like that, my night is ruined. The one player I prayed that SF would NOT take was Arik Armstead. A DE who has zero pass rush skills and didn't show any ability to rack up tackles in the run game at Oregon. Sure, he's tall as shit, but this isn't a pick up hoops game at the local rec center, this is the NFL, where you need to produce. Fuck me sideways... Dion Jordan 2.0 (minus the drug problem) Title: Re: Fins Draft Parker at #14 Post by: Sunstroke on April 30, 2015, 10:08:28 pm And, just in case the taste of vomit in my mouth wasn't spicy enough, the 49ers signed former Dolphins LB Phillip Wheeler to a 1-year deal. ...and the hits just keep on comin'! >:( Title: Re: Fins Draft Parker at #14 Post by: MikeO on April 30, 2015, 10:09:15 pm And, just in case the taste of vomit in my mouth wasn't spicy enough, the 49ers signed former Dolphins LB Phillip Wheeler to a 1-year deal. ...and the hits just keep on comin'! >:( When it rains its pours! Title: Re: Fins Draft Parker at #14 Post by: Sunstroke on April 30, 2015, 10:09:34 pm Dion Jordan 2.0 (minus the drug problem) At least Dion Jordan showed some sign of being able to rush the QB while he was in college. The only skills that Armstead showed was being able to get shit down off of the top shelf of the cupboard. Title: Re: Fins Draft Parker at #14 Post by: MikeO on April 30, 2015, 10:15:53 pm At least Dion Jordan showed some sign of being able to rush the QB while he was in college. The only skills that Armstead showed was being able to get shit down off of the top shelf of the cupboard. At least SF got new alternate uniforms today. That's something to look forward to Title: Re: Fins Draft Parker at #14 Post by: MyGodWearsAHoodie on April 30, 2015, 10:22:05 pm Problem with winning the super bowl is it is taking forever to get to ne's turn
Title: Re: Fins Draft Parker at #14 Post by: Sunstroke on April 30, 2015, 10:26:07 pm At least SF got new alternate uniforms today. That's something to look forward to You've got "annoying know-it-all" on your resume already...and now you're trying to add "superior douchiness?" I can appreciate anyone looking to expand their skill set... Title: Re: Fins Draft Parker at #14 Post by: ArtieChokePhin on April 30, 2015, 10:42:33 pm Huge pickup here. Looks like the receiving corps will have some stability for once
Title: Re: Fins Draft Parker at #14 Post by: DenverFinFan on April 30, 2015, 11:11:26 pm It sounds good, let's just hope Tannehill can stand up next year.
Title: Re: Fins Draft Parker at #14 Post by: mecadonzilla on May 01, 2015, 12:14:21 am The Fins not only filled a need, but also took the best player available. It's weird to feel this weird "happiness" emotion on draft day. I'm just not used to it.
Title: Re: Fins Draft Parker at #14 Post by: Sunstroke on May 01, 2015, 02:27:00 am Yeah, I'm coming around to the Armstead pick as well. I still have my doubts, but too many "football people" seem to think he is the perfect type of DE for SF's system. Besides, if Tomsula, a D-line coach, wanted the guy, maybe he has a plan for him. I still think we could have traded even further back in round one and still gotten him, but at least we got an extra couple of picks out of the deal. Now we still have a 2nd, a 3rd, 3x 4th, a 5th, a 6th and 2x 7th rounders to fill in other positions. If SF reeeeeally wants to make it up to me, they'll use one of those 4th round picks to move up in round two and grab Dorial Green-Beckham. Title: Re: Fins Draft Parker at #14 Post by: Rich on May 01, 2015, 09:06:49 am Parker has had 3 drops in 2 years. Miami also has their WR's locked up for years to come. Parker locked up for 5 more years Landry locked up for 4 more years Stills locked up for 3 more years WR issue solved for a while! The Dolphins have a bunch of guys with good hands now... last season we had a lot of drops, especially early in the season. Title: Re: Fins Draft Parker at #14 Post by: Dolphster on May 01, 2015, 09:29:08 am I would have loved to have seen Scherff make it to #14 but that clearly wasn't going to be a realistic expectation. With Scherff off the board, Parker was definitely the sensible pick. I'm happy. Barring the injury bug, I see the Fins having an improved record this year. Not sure if they are ready to be a playoff team, but I do think they are moving in the right direction. Hopefully there will be a quality Guard available in Round 2 that can challenge to be a solid starter in his rookie year.
Title: Re: Fins Draft Parker at #14 Post by: Phishfan on May 01, 2015, 11:27:22 am I just want to say, "I told you so".
I see us drafting Parker. Fins are gonna have to move up to get one of the Top 3 WR's in Rd 1. Too many teams in need of WR's are ahead of us. Raiders, Jets, Cleveland, New Orleans (after Stills trade this is a need)..among others who might grab one if they guy they want isn't there (ie Rams.) Cooper, White, and Parker will go quick in Rd 1. Real quick. Fins need to move up to the Top 10 to get one of these guys. And I'm all for it honestly, trade up and go big! If they stay at #14 they might end up with the next WR after Parker who they have rated the highest. Title: Re: Fins Draft Parker at #14 Post by: Tenshot13 on May 01, 2015, 11:45:40 am ^^^oh snap! SHOTS FIRED, SHOTS FIRED!
Title: Re: Fins Draft Parker at #14 Post by: Spider-Dan on May 01, 2015, 11:46:44 am I was hoping for Gurley or Parker, so I'm happy.
Title: Re: Fins Draft Parker at #14 Post by: MikeO on May 01, 2015, 12:42:35 pm I was hoping for Gurley or Parker, so I'm happy. Fins have cut about $15-$20 mill in WR salary and improved their WR corp top to bottom in one offseason. Not to mention if Cameron can avoid a concussion they upgraded their TE as well. Fix the o-line and get a back to share with Miller and this offense will be exciting to watch Title: Re: Fins Draft Parker at #14 Post by: MikeO on May 06, 2015, 10:05:04 pm Looks like Parker is going to wear #11.
Title: Re: Fins Draft Parker at #14 Post by: ArtieChokePhin on May 07, 2015, 09:06:17 pm Looks like Parker has signed. It's good that the Fins locked him in early.
Title: Re: Fins Draft Parker at #14 Post by: MikeO on May 07, 2015, 09:36:51 pm The Dolphins signed their entire rookie class today to contracts. Impressive to sign the entire rookie class before the rookie mini-camp! Never seen it before.
Hickey and Tannenbaum put some serious work in! Title: Re: Fins Draft Parker at #14 Post by: Dolphster on May 08, 2015, 08:27:20 am Wow, that is awesome. One less distraction for the rooks and the front office.
Title: Re: Fins Draft Parker at #14 Post by: Brian Fein on May 08, 2015, 08:38:02 am if nothing else it shows that they mean serious business and the players are here to work. Good for them.
Title: Re: Fins Draft Parker at #14 Post by: Rich on May 08, 2015, 08:39:11 am The Dolphins signed their entire rookie class today to contracts. Impressive to sign the entire rookie class before the rookie mini-camp! Never seen it before. Hickey and Tannenbaum put some serious work in! I'm not impressed by this. With the rookie scale, it shouldn't be difficult to sign rookies. That was part of the purpose. This is actually a poor reflection on Ireland, who took forever to sign rookies because he wanted to be a tough negotiator or some shit like that. That's how low Ireland set the bar, that people are impressed by Hickey and Tannenbaum doing something so elementary. Title: Re: Fins Draft Parker at #14 Post by: MikeO on May 08, 2015, 08:56:13 am I'm not impressed by this. With the rookie scale, it shouldn't be difficult to sign rookies. So why hasn't every other team done this? If its so easy 32 teams should have their entire rookie class signed as of yesterday Title: Re: Fins Draft Parker at #14 Post by: Rich on May 08, 2015, 09:22:12 am So why hasn't every other team done this? If its so easy 32 teams should have their entire rookie class signed as of yesterday That still doesn't make this impressive. The rookie scale was designed to slot players into contracts. There really isn't anything to negotiate. Title: Re: Fins Draft Parker at #14 Post by: fyo on May 08, 2015, 09:27:45 am That still doesn't make this impressive. The rookie scale was designed to slot players into contracts. There really isn't anything to negotiate. That's not quite true. Base salary is pretty much fixed with the new CBA, but there are bonuses (signing, workout, roster, performance) and guarantees to work out. Oh, and just to add: How much do you think a late-round draft pick makes if he DOESN'T make the team (final cuts, 53-man roster)? Title: Re: Fins Draft Parker at #14 Post by: Rich on May 08, 2015, 09:38:03 am That's not quite true. Base salary is pretty much fixed with the new CBA, but there are bonuses (signing, workout, roster, performance) and guarantees to work out. Oh, and just to add: How much do you think a late-round draft pick makes if he DOESN'T make the team (final cuts, 53-man roster)? Quote Now, instead of each team having an allotment, each pick has a predetermined amount. In other words, a player and his agent know the exact dollar figures the moment he is drafted. They also know the length; every contract is for four years, with first-round picks subject to a team option for a fifth year, also at predetermined rates. As for salaries, the vast majority of drafted players have four years of non-guaranteed minimum salaries, accompanied by a signing bonus that’s not negotiated by the agent, but predetermined by the CBA. http://mmqb.si.com/2014/05/22/nfl-rookie-contract-negotiations/ Title: Re: Fins Draft Parker at #14 Post by: Rich on May 08, 2015, 09:39:41 am Quote With no opportunity for negotiating, many players are questioning why they need to have an agent to handle rookie contracts. Indeed, one first-rounder in 2013, the Ravens’ Matt Elam, opted not to use (ahem, pay) an agent because there would be no difference in the numbers. Title: Re: Fins Draft Parker at #14 Post by: Rich on May 08, 2015, 09:42:35 am Quote Preset contract numbers have made the pace of rookie signings in mid-May mimic the pace of rookie signings in mid-July in the NFL’s old way of doing business. The Bears, led by longtime contract negotiator Cliff Stein, signed their entire 2014 class of rookies in four days. The Raiders have already secured the fifth pick in the draft, Khalil Mack—a remarkably swift resolution for such a high pick. (I once negotiated the fifth pick of the draft, A.J. Hawk, in a three-month back-and-forth that resulted in a 63-page contract.) Indeed, where teams used to point to the start of training camp as a target date for having their picks signed, some teams are now targeting that date at the start of minicamp. At 5 p.m. EDT on Wednesday, a mere 11 days since the 2014 draft concluded, more than half of the 256 selections were signed. The numbers, by rounds: Round Picks Signed 1 7 2 12 3 11 4 28 5 27 6 32 7 34 Total: 151 . Rookie holdouts are now relics of a bygone era. While some negotiations will not resolve until the eve of training camp, the holdups will be about structure, not compensation. As a top union official told me, a “highly-trained monkey could negotiate these numbers.” Like I said, this is the new norm. Only a doof like Ireland was missing that boat and trying to play hardball with rookies when there was no need. Title: Re: Fins Draft Parker at #14 Post by: fyo on May 08, 2015, 09:42:48 am ^ True about signing bonuses. Other bonuses can still be negotiated (rtfa), as can the payout structure of the signing bonus (rtfa, although I'd expect late-round picks to get it all at once). Guarantees are also still fully negotiable (rtfa).
But thank you for that minor correction. Well noted. Title: Re: Fins Draft Parker at #14 Post by: Rich on May 08, 2015, 09:45:28 am But thank you for that minor correction. Well noted. I don't consider that minor. The signing bonus is the largest commitment a team makes to a player and the money the player sees before anything else. It is the most important bonus in the contract. Yeah you can guarantee salary, like the Cowboys did with Collins, on any rookie. But the fact is most teams don't really care too much because at the end of the day the cap hits are going to equal out the same. Title: Re: Fins Draft Parker at #14 Post by: fyo on May 08, 2015, 09:45:53 am Ironically, the issues surrounding contracts are probably a lot simpler for early picks. Whether you get $10k more guaranteed or not matters a whole heck of a lot more to a 7th round pick than a 2nd rounder.
And, to answer my question from before: Late round picks get nothing unless they make the final cuts, except for a few bucks during camp. Title: Re: Fins Draft Parker at #14 Post by: fyo on May 08, 2015, 09:47:17 am Yeah you can guarantee salary, like the Cowboys did with Collins, on any rookie. But the fact is most teams don't really care too much because at the end of the day the cap hits are going to equal out the same. No, the cap hits are not the same. Guaranteed salary will count against the cap even if you cut the player. That's not the case with normal salary. Title: Re: Fins Draft Parker at #14 Post by: Rich on May 08, 2015, 09:48:47 am No, the cap hits are not the same. Guaranteed salary will count against the cap even if you cut the player. That's not the case with normal salary. I get that, but how many teams are cutting their first round picks after one season? Let's be practical, not hypothetical. Title: Re: Fins Draft Parker at #14 Post by: fyo on May 08, 2015, 09:51:24 am I get that, but how many teams are cutting their first round picks after one season? Let's be practical, not hypothetical. Which is why I said that the later picks are probably more complicated after the new deal than the early picks. Title: Re: Fins Draft Parker at #14 Post by: Rich on May 08, 2015, 09:59:35 am Which is why I said that the later picks are probably more complicated after the new deal than the early picks. *shrugs* Ok, my overall point still stands. It should be "paint by numbers" to get your draft picks signed quickly and some teams have caught on to this. The Jeff Ireland-run Dolphins were going in the opposite direction on this, as well as many other common sense things. Title: Re: Fins Draft Parker at #14 Post by: MikeO on May 08, 2015, 10:12:51 am *shrugs* Ok, my overall point still stands. It should be "paint by numbers" to get your draft picks signed quickly and some teams have caught on to this. The Jeff Ireland-run Dolphins were going in the opposite direction on this, as well as many other common sense things. yes its easier to do these days, nobody is arguing that. But if its so easy every team should have everyone signed by yesterday or today. They don't. That was the only point. Fins were on top of this and got it done super quick. Not saying they get jobs for life out of it, but give them a some credit...jesus! Title: Re: Fins Draft Parker at #14 Post by: Rich on May 08, 2015, 10:19:38 am yes its easier to do these days, nobody is arguing that. But if its so easy every team should have everyone signed by yesterday or today. They don't. That was the only point. Fins were on top of this and got it done super quick. Not saying they get jobs for life out of it, but give them a some credit...jesus! Ok, I will give them some credit for not being as stupid as Jeff Ireland. ;) Title: Re: Fins Draft Parker at #14 Post by: Tenshot13 on May 08, 2015, 02:06:50 pm Ok, I will give them some credit for not being as stupid as Jeff Ireland. ;) May as well give 31 other teams credit thenTitle: Re: Fins Draft Parker at #14 Post by: Rich on May 08, 2015, 02:12:56 pm May as well give 31 other teams credit then Touche. Title: Re: Fins Draft Parker at #14 Post by: fyo on May 22, 2015, 02:10:24 pm Ok, I will give them some credit for not being as stupid as Jeff Ireland. ;) 1/3 of the first round picks are still unsigned. Apparently, what the Dolphins managed in two days wasn't all that easy. (No idea about picks outside the first round... nfl.com track the first round only) Title: Re: Fins Draft Parker at #14 Post by: Rich on May 22, 2015, 02:17:27 pm 1/3 of the first round picks are still unsigned. Apparently, what the Dolphins managed in two days wasn't all that easy. The world is full of idiots. That doesn't make those that aren't idiots geniuses. Title: Re: Fins Draft Parker at #14 Post by: fyo on May 22, 2015, 05:40:38 pm The world is full of idiots. That doesn't make those that aren't idiots geniuses. I take it you don't like grading on a curve. |