Title: Looks like I was right about Suh so far Post by: dolphins4life on September 20, 2015, 08:20:28 pm All that money could have been better spent on the oline
Title: Re: Looks like I was right about Suh so far Post by: Tenshot13 on September 20, 2015, 08:43:43 pm All that money could have been better spent on the oline ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::)Title: Re: Looks like I was right about Suh so far Post by: EDGECRUSHER on September 20, 2015, 09:49:17 pm There are definitely positives to signing the best DT in the league, but he hasn't shown them so far. Hopefully, something clicks and he becomes the player he has been because he will be here for a LONG time. If he is a bust, it cripples the franchise.
Title: Re: Looks like I was right about Suh so far Post by: MikeO on September 20, 2015, 10:06:59 pm There are definitely positives to signing the best DT in the league, but he hasn't shown them so far. Hopefully, something clicks and he becomes the player he has been because he will be here for a LONG time. If he is a bust, it cripples the franchise. Let's be honest, the other dlinemen around him we might have overrated. Mitchell is a nice player, run of the mill. A total JAG Wake is past his prime Vernon is nice, but not elite by any means And the back-ups are just that back-ups nothing special. Just nice players. Title: Re: Looks like I was right about Suh so far Post by: Pappy13 on September 21, 2015, 12:08:12 am Let's be honest, the other dlinemen around him we might have overrated. Might have? No, you absolutely did. Not just you, just about everyone. I was one of the few saying tap that brakes on that till they play a couple games and after 2 games, it's not tap the brakes it's steer the damn thing out of the ditch. Remember Suh was going to make all of them better? Well none of them are better so far and Suh himself hasn't been anything special. Suh and Wake were talking about having the best defensive line in the league. That's a laugh. Be nice to have the best defensive line in the game at this point because the defensive line is 0-2 in that regard. Remember how they were gonna make the offensive line better? Not so much. Everyone VASTLY overated the defense. It's been horrible so far, in fact there's no where to go but up because they are bottom of the league at this point.Title: Re: Looks like I was right about Suh so far Post by: MikeO on September 21, 2015, 12:14:54 am Wake played like 1 quarter today, tough to rip him. He was injured
Title: Re: Looks like I was right about Suh so far Post by: Pappy13 on September 21, 2015, 12:24:00 am Wake played like 1 quarter today, tough to rip him. He was injured He played plenty the last half of last year and did nothing. I can rip his ass all I want.Title: Re: Looks like I was right about Suh so far Post by: MikeO on September 21, 2015, 12:24:28 am He played plenty the last half of last year and did nothing. I can rip his ass all I want. You can, doesn't mean you are correct Title: Re: Looks like I was right about Suh so far Post by: Pappy13 on September 21, 2015, 12:44:44 am You can, doesn't mean you are correct He has one maybe two plays a game where he actually makes a difference and disappears the rest of the game. Everyone cut him slack last year because he didn't have a dominant tackle next to him, but now that he's got one he's still missing in action for 5 quarters this year. I'm tired of making excuses for him. 2 tackles and 1/2 sack a game is not getting it done.Title: Re: Looks like I was right about Suh so far Post by: CF DolFan on September 21, 2015, 09:10:39 am Going back to last season it does appear Wake's best days are behind him. I'm completely baffled by Suh's performance to this point. It's not like he is losing these battles to pro-bowlers. He's losing 1v1 to kids who haven't ever done anything. I know emotion is a big part of sports. I've seen the best athletes completely fail at the biggest times against people they normally dominate because they literally over-psyched themselves before performing and then didn't have their normal energy and mindset come game time. I hope this is all this is.
Title: Re: Looks like I was right about Suh so far Post by: Tenshot13 on September 21, 2015, 09:19:41 am Going back to last season it does appear Wake's best days are behind him. I'm completely baffled by Suh's performance to this point. It's not like he is losing these battles to pro-bowlers. He's losing 1v1 to kids who haven't ever done anything. I know emotion is a big part of sports. I've seen the best athletes completely fail at the biggest times against people they normally dominate because they literally over-psyched themselves before performing and then didn't have their normal energy and mindset come game time. I hope this is all this is. Is that true? Every time I saw him, he was double teamed. I could have missed his 1v1 matchups though.Title: Re: Looks like I was right about Suh so far Post by: Phishfan on September 21, 2015, 09:33:32 am Is that true? Every time I saw him, he was double teamed. I could have missed his 1v1 matchups though. The announcers even mentioned during the game that Suh was not getting double teamed and that he usually is. Title: Re: Looks like I was right about Suh so far Post by: CF DolFan on September 21, 2015, 09:34:59 am The announcers even mentioned during the game that Suh was not getting double teamed and that he usually is. Mentioned it and showed replays of it. Title: Re: Looks like I was right about Suh so far Post by: Tenshot13 on September 21, 2015, 09:41:09 am I was at a sports bar and the sound was of the PHI/DAL game, so I missed that.
Title: Re: Looks like I was right about Suh so far Post by: MikeO on September 21, 2015, 11:38:24 am It's about to hit the fan in Miami. Wake played 15 snaps (and the team said he wasn't injured.) Fede played 43 snaps and Shelby 42 snaps!
Per the Miami Herald: The Dolphins said Wake was not injured Sunday and Wake said afterward that any questions about his lack of playing time should be directed to the coach. Title: Re: Looks like I was right about Suh so far Post by: Cathal on September 21, 2015, 11:44:46 am Can the players rise up and get Coyle and Philbin fired? How nice would that be.
Title: Re: Looks like I was right about Suh so far Post by: MikeO on September 21, 2015, 11:46:14 am Can the players rise up and get Coyle and Philbin fired? How nice would that be. They can but it might mean sitting through a season of 2-5 wins. Title: Re: Looks like I was right about Suh so far Post by: EDGECRUSHER on September 21, 2015, 12:53:11 pm They can but it might mean sitting through a season of 2-5 wins. I would much rather have 2 wins than 8 wins. 2 wins means change is coming about. 8 wins means they maintain the status quo and just tweak things. Title: Re: Looks like I was right about Suh so far Post by: masterfins on September 21, 2015, 12:59:55 pm Don't worry, if Miami doesn't make the playoffs AND win a playoff game this year, Philbin will be fired.
Title: Re: Looks like I was right about Suh so far Post by: CF DolFan on September 21, 2015, 03:33:24 pm I don't have an issue with Wake sitting. The D-line got better when the second team came in against Washington. These guys obviously need something to get motivated as they have been getting bitch slapped by everyone they face. Reputation doesn't win games.
Edited to say Philbin just reiterated that Wake was hurt. Omar Kelly @OmarKelly 3h3 hours ago Joe Philbin said Cam Wake didn't play in the second half because of the hamstring issue, which is impacting his performance. Title: Re: Looks like I was right about Suh so far Post by: CF DolFan on September 22, 2015, 09:12:11 am Is that true? Every time I saw him, he was double teamed. I could have missed his 1v1 matchups though. Saw this this morning and thought of you. It's a perfect example of Suh getting killed on a 1v1 and them making a big play. https://instagram.com/p/77t1QYhZhvppZBJkzyVZV5GUOaKm10wH9yFFY0/ One of the best questions I've seen raised is that maybe the caliber of guards he is completing against in practice isn't getting him ready to compete on Sunday? It really doesn't help him if he can coast in practice and still be dominant. Title: Re: Looks like I was right about Suh so far Post by: bsmooth on September 23, 2015, 07:19:57 pm Suh started out the same last season for the first two games, and then came alive.
Title: Re: Looks like I was right about Suh so far Post by: Dave Gray on September 24, 2015, 10:25:26 am Also, we can't really judge Suh on sacks. That position, in general, doesn't get a lot like defensive ends do. It's more pressures and disruption. It won't be as easily measurable as some of you might like.
Title: Re: Looks like I was right about Suh so far Post by: Tenshot13 on September 24, 2015, 10:42:25 am Also, we can't really judge Suh on sacks. That position, in general, doesn't get a lot like defensive ends do. It's more pressures and disruption. It won't be as easily measurable as some of you might like. This exactly. Wilfork's most sacks in a season is only 3.5, but people still considered him an all-pro because of the disruptions he'd cause. Same thing with Suh.Title: Re: Looks like I was right about Suh so far Post by: Phishfan on September 24, 2015, 11:32:15 am No one here is even mentioning sacks except for people sticking up for Suh. I'd settle for seeing him do anything. He isn't making tackles, he isn't getting pressure, he isn't freeing the linebackers. Just do something.
Title: Re: Looks like I was right about Suh so far Post by: Dave Gray on September 24, 2015, 02:18:07 pm ^ Yeah, totally. I was just saying that Suh's ineffectiveness and the "we only have 1 sack in two games" get brought up together, but they are necessarily the same problem.
Title: Re: Looks like I was right about Suh so far Post by: MyGodWearsAHoodie on September 24, 2015, 03:29:28 pm This exactly. Wilfork's most sacks in a season is only 3.5, but people still considered him an all-pro because of the disruptions he'd cause. Same thing with Suh. True, but many of the sacks that NEP DEs got was because of the disruptions that Wilfork caused in the middle. Suh doesn't have to sack the QB to be effective, if the QB is sacked b/c Suh was double teamed and pushing the QB out of the pocket allowing someone else to sack him he would be an effective tackle. That is not happening. Title: Re: Looks like I was right about Suh so far Post by: Tenshot13 on September 24, 2015, 03:44:59 pm True, but many of the sacks that NEP DEs got was because of the disruptions that Wilfork caused in the middle. Suh doesn't have to sack the QB to be effective, if the QB is sacked b/c Suh was double teamed and pushing the QB out of the pocket allowing someone else to sack him he would be an effective tackle. That is not happening. This is exactly what I said...Title: Re: Looks like I was right about Suh so far Post by: MyGodWearsAHoodie on September 29, 2015, 02:21:10 pm With Suh (and any other players) to determine how good he is you need to look at both the positive and the negative.
Yes, in Detroit he was a disruptive force in the middle. He can sack the QB and tackle runners behind the LOS. But when you take all the positive he did and subtract things like, giving the the opposing team a first down and 15 yards for penalties his overall effectiveness drops to merely being an average player. If you tackle runner on first and 10 2 yards behind the LOS but then after the ball is dead you get a 15 yard penalty for unsportsmanlike conduct, you hurt rather than helped your team. Title: Re: Looks like I was right about Suh so far Post by: MikeO on September 29, 2015, 02:24:07 pm With Suh (and any other players) to determine how good he is you need to look at both the positive and the negative. Yes, in Detroit he was a disruptive force in the middle. He can sack the QB and tackle runners behind the LOS. But when you take all the positive he did and subtract things like, giving the the opposing team a first down and 15 yards for penalties his overall effectiveness drops to merely being an average player. If you tackle runner on first and 10 2 yards behind the LOS but then after the ball is dead you get a 15 yard penalty for unsportsmanlike conduct, you hurt rather than helped your team. He hasn't had a personal foul penalty in 3 games with the Dolphins, so until he gets one with the Fins its a non issue Title: Re: Looks like I was right about Suh so far Post by: Spider-Dan on September 29, 2015, 02:26:43 pm Yes, in Detroit he was a disruptive force in the middle. He can sack the QB and tackle runners behind the LOS. So how many personal foul penalties are you saying that Suh collected in his 5 years with DET? Must be an awful lot to drop him down to "average."But when you take all the positive he did and subtract things like, giving the the opposing team a first down and 15 yards for penalties his overall effectiveness drops to merely being an average player. Title: Re: Looks like I was right about Suh so far Post by: Tenshot13 on September 29, 2015, 02:31:44 pm All of Suh's penalties with Detroit, and only 6 personal fouls in his career. Yup, definitely drops him down to "average" ::)
2010 2010-09-19 @ 1 2 5 PHI 25 0 0 Encroachment 4 2010 2010-09-26 2 1 10 MIN 46 7 7 Roughing the Passer 15 2010 2010-10-17 2 2 20 NYG 19 7 7 Illegal Use of Hands 5 2010 2010-11-07 @ 5 3 6 DET 12 23 20 Leverage D 2010 2010-11-14 1 1 10 DET 46 0 0 Neutral Zone Infraction 5 2010 2010-11-21 1 1 10 DAL 45 0 0 Defensive Offside 5 2010 2010-11-21 4 2 13 DET 13 21 19 Horse Collar Tackle 6 2010 2010-11-25 @ 4 45 24 Unnecessary Roughness 15 2010 2010-12-05 @ 4 1 10 DET 22 17 20 Unnecessary Roughness 7 2010 2010-12-12 @ 1 2 3 GNB 27 0 0 Illegal Block Above the 10 2010 2010-12-26 4 2 6 MIA 12 27 34 Face Mask (15 Yards) 15 2011 2011-09-11 2 3 2 DET 26 10 20 Unsportsmanlike Conduct 13 2011 2011-10-02 3 3 3 DAL 39 27 17 Roughing the Passer 15 2011 2011-10-10 @ 1 1 10 CHI 34 0 0 Neutral Zone Infraction 5 2011 2011-10-23 @ 1 1 10 ATL 23 0 3 Face Mask (15 Yards) 15 2011 2011-11-20 @ 3 1 10 CAR 20 27 21 Illegal Use of Hands 5 2011 2011-11-24 @ 3 3 3 DET 3 7 0 Disqualification 2 2011 2011-12-18 3 2 1 RAI 17 17 14 Defensive Offside 5 2011 2012-01-01 4 3 3 GNB 43 38 41 Encroachment 5 2012 2012-09-16 2 1 10 DET 44 14 6 Encroachment 5 2012 2012-12-09 3 3 6 GNB 41 10 14 Roughing the Passer 15 2012 2012-12-22 @ 1 2 11 ATL 46 0 0 Encroachment 5 2013 2013-09-08 @ 2 2 1 MIN 29 7 6 Low Block 15 2013 2013-10-06 1 3 7 GNB 34 0 0 Tripping 10 2013 2013-10-13 3 2 10 CLE 20 17 14 Neutral Zone Infraction 5 2013 2013-10-13 2 1 4 DET 4 7 7 Defensive Offside 2 2013 2013-10-27 @ 2 3 7 DET 40 0 7 Neutral Zone Infraction 5 2013 2013-12-08 4 2 10 DET 40 12 14 Defensive Holding 1 2013 2013-12-29 2 3 6 MIN 20 7 0 Encroachment 5 2014 2014-09-14 2 1 10 CAR 39 3 0 Illegal Use of Hands D 2014 2014-09-28 2 1 10 NYJ 7 3 10 Defensive Offside 5 2014 2014-10-19 @ 1 1 10 NOR 17 0 0 Defensive Offside 5 2014 2014-11-09 @ 2 3 3 DET 24 0 10 Face Mask (15 Yards) 10 2014 2014-11-23 2 1 6 DET 6 7 6 Encroachment 3 2014 2014-12-07 @ 2 2 13 TAM 33 3 17 Roughing the Passer 9 2014 2014-12-14 @ 1 1 10 MIN 10 0 0 Defensive Offside 5 2014 2014-12-28 4 2 10 DET 30 21 14 Defensive Offside 5 35 Accepted Penalties 262 Title: Re: Looks like I was right about Suh so far Post by: MyGodWearsAHoodie on September 29, 2015, 02:45:52 pm Not sure how you came up with only 6, Roughing the Passer, Illegal Use of Hands, Unnecessary Roughness, Face Mask are all bonehead plays.
35 accepted penalties on 36 sacks. So one more play where he had the best outcome than the worst. Title: Re: Looks like I was right about Suh so far Post by: Tenshot13 on September 29, 2015, 03:22:09 pm Not sure how you came up with only 6, Roughing the Passer, Illegal Use of Hands, Unnecessary Roughness, Face Mask are all bonehead plays. Because I just skimmed it...fine I see 10 instead of 6 then...you're acting like he has a personal foul multiple times a game which cancels out his great play. It doesn't, they don't happen frequently enough.35 accepted penalties on 36 sacks. So one more play where he had the best outcome than the worst. Title: Re: Looks like I was right about Suh so far Post by: Phishfan on September 29, 2015, 03:26:46 pm Thanks Tenshot. Can you give a rundown on the numbers on each line item? There is a group of three numbers, team name, three more numbers, what the penalty was, and a number. Looks like the very last number is the number of yards penalized.
What are the others? Title: Re: Looks like I was right about Suh so far Post by: Tenshot13 on September 29, 2015, 03:33:01 pm Not sure how you came up with only 6, Roughing the Passer, Illegal Use of Hands, Unnecessary Roughness, Face Mask are all bonehead plays. So by your logic, Vince Wilfork is the worst player in the NFL. 33 accepted penalties to 16 career sacks. So 17 more plays where he had the WORST outcome than the BEST.35 accepted penalties on 36 sacks. So one more play where he had the best outcome than the worst. You can't judge a DT on sacks and you know this, so I don't know why you're using it as a base for your ludicrous argument. Title: Re: Looks like I was right about Suh so far Post by: Tenshot13 on September 29, 2015, 03:38:41 pm Thanks Tenshot. Can you give a rundown on the numbers on each line item? There is a group of three numbers, team name, three more numbers, what the penalty was, and a number. Looks like the very last number is the number of yards penalized. What are the others? Pro-Football-Reference.com doesn't have headers on their columns. Here's a link to Vince Wilfork's career penalties, since it was the last one I looked up. You might be able to judge from that. http://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/W/WilfVi20/penalties/ (http://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/W/WilfVi20/penalties/) Title: Re: Looks like I was right about Suh so far Post by: Dave Gray on September 29, 2015, 03:49:14 pm It doesn't make sense to judge Suh's position with sacks. It's not a position that normally gets sacks.
Title: Re: Looks like I was right about Suh so far Post by: dolphins4life on September 29, 2015, 04:22:18 pm The problem is if you tie that much money up in him, you can't use it to get good enough players to complement him.
Title: Re: Looks like I was right about Suh so far Post by: Phishfan on September 29, 2015, 04:25:29 pm Pro-Football-Reference.com doesn't have headers on their columns. Here's a link to Vince Wilfork's career penalties, since it was the last one I looked up. You might be able to judge from that. http://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/W/WilfVi20/penalties/ (http://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/W/WilfVi20/penalties/) Thanks again. My best guess then is the Quarter (I assume the 5 is for overtime) down and distance ball position (after the team name) and the score at the time Title: Re: Looks like I was right about Suh so far Post by: masterfins on September 29, 2015, 04:43:25 pm The problem is if you tie that much money up in him, you can't use it to get good enough players to complement him. Wrong. For years Miami has been signing average complimentary players; at some point you need to step up and sign some studs to lead the team. Miami chose Suh for the defense. I certainly wasn't a fan of his given the couple incidents he had, but you can't judge his signing as a bust after only three games. Title: Re: Looks like I was right about Suh so far Post by: MikeO on September 29, 2015, 05:33:47 pm Suh isn't the problem. Suh is setting the table the linebackers are doing nothing behind him. Suh can move the guys out of the way if the linebackers don't make plays....can't blame Suh.
Sheppard is worthless as as MLB Title: Re: Looks like I was right about Suh so far Post by: MikeO on October 01, 2015, 06:40:59 pm NFL Network had a brilliant piece on Suh and the Fins defense. Through 3 games Suh is doing exactly what they paid him to do. Eatting up Double and Triple teams and in many circumstances winning vs the double teams. They had endless examples and video proof. The point they raised is Wake and Vernon are doing absolutely nothing at all this year through 3 games when they should be dominating with the way Suh is playing and what he is doing. And they showed video of Wake/Vernon getting abused by marginal plaeyrs
Title: Re: Looks like I was right about Suh so far Post by: Phishfan on October 02, 2015, 01:32:34 am NFL Network had a brilliant piece on Suh and the Fins defense. Through 3 games Suh is doing exactly what they paid him to do. Eatting up Double and Triple teams and in many circumstances winning vs the double teams. They had endless examples and video proof. The point they raised is Wake and Vernon are doing absolutely nothing at all this year through 3 games when they should be dominating with the way Suh is playing and what he is doing. And they showed video of Wake/Vernon getting abused by marginal plaeyrs I wish I had seen that. I'm curious how many examples there were and from what games. I admit the last game I was not watching him closely because I had given up because the team had as well but I distinctly remember watching him being taken on by single blockers and the announcers pointing it out in the second game. Title: Re: Looks like I was right about Suh so far Post by: CF DolFan on October 02, 2015, 11:20:50 am There are many examples of him losing 1v1s and i even posted one. I agree the other guys haven't stepped up but Suh is not playing like Suh of the past either. Our whole defensive line has been a disappointment.
Title: Re: Looks like I was right about Suh so far Post by: MikeO on October 02, 2015, 12:04:39 pm There are Yes there are some examples but if you saw the NFL Network piece the good has far outweighed the bad so far through 3 games and he is playing like the Suh of old, just he has zero support around him from the DE's and linebackers Title: Re: Looks like I was right about Suh so far Post by: Phishfan on October 02, 2015, 12:57:43 pm he has zero support around him from the DE's and linebackers This I will not disagree with |