Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
November 15, 2024, 03:50:58 am
Home Help Search Calendar Login Register
News: Brian Fein is now blogging weekly!  Make sure to check the homepage for his latest editorial.
+  The Dolphins Make Me Cry.com - Forums
|-+  TDMMC Forums
| |-+  Around the NFL (Moderators: Spider-Dan, MyGodWearsAHoodie)
| | |-+  The philosophy of finding an NFL QB.
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3] Print
Author Topic: The philosophy of finding an NFL QB.  (Read 5725 times)
MyGodWearsAHoodie
Global Moderator
Uber Member
*****
Posts: 14478



« Reply #30 on: December 30, 2010, 12:48:12 pm »

Thank you.  I don't think my system is convoluted though, just more complex.

No its convoluted.  Cause it is first and foremost a rating system based on what position the player plays, than based on teams needs, and then finally based on BAP, yet you call it BAP.  
Logged

There are two rules for success:
 1. Never tell everything you know.
MyGodWearsAHoodie
Global Moderator
Uber Member
*****
Posts: 14478



« Reply #31 on: December 30, 2010, 12:58:51 pm »

My system doesn't necessarily give you the best 25, but it should give you the best 53.  That's what I'm shooting for.

I agree you should be shooting for the best 53.  But you are only replacing starters  in one or two rounds.  If there is a guard that is better than NEP second best guard, NEP is better off drafting him than upgrading Hoyer in round 2.   

Once we are past the point of drafting guys who could start.  We start doing analysis of which would help the team more....adding this WR and dropping our 5th best WR or adding this RB and dropping our 4th best RB or adding this linebacker and dropping our 7th best linebacker or adding this QB and dropping our current backup QB.   

This is the way to build the best 53, IMHO. 
Logged

There are two rules for success:
 1. Never tell everything you know.
Pappy13
Uber Member
*****
Posts: 8325



« Reply #32 on: December 30, 2010, 01:00:27 pm »

No its convoluted.  Cause it is first and foremost a rating system based on what position the player plays, than based on teams needs, and then finally based on BAP, yet you call it BAP.  
I disagree.  In my opinion BAP takes position into consideration.  How can you decide "best" without taking into consideration the position they play?  BAP IS a positional as well as talent level determination.  You combine the talent level of the player with his ability to impact the game to determine "best".  That's what Mel does in my opinion.

Then after BAP you're looking at need, but BAP is still the most important factor, not need.
Logged

That which does not kill me...gives me XP.
Pappy13
Uber Member
*****
Posts: 8325



« Reply #33 on: December 30, 2010, 01:12:30 pm »

Once we are past the point of drafting guys who could start.  We start doing analysis of which would help the team more....adding this WR and dropping our 5th best WR or adding this RB and dropping our 4th best RB or adding this linebacker and dropping our 7th best linebacker or adding this QB and dropping our current backup QB.   

This is the way to build the best 53, IMHO. 
Agreed, but this is done in pre-season, not during the draft.  In the draft you're just trying to get what you think are the best group of guys you can get.  After the draft there's a free agent period where there is no draft position so it's easier to target specific guys you want and go after them.  After that you have preseason where you start to evaluate the talent you have on your roster.  There are ALWAYS surprises.  A guy who you thought was going to be a camp casualty is suddenly your 2nd best WR (Bess).  A guy you thought would make a huge impact gets hurt (Odrick).  These things effect your "need" and these things CANNOT be anticipated, so you don't try, you simply deal with them the best you can as they come up.
« Last Edit: December 30, 2010, 01:19:34 pm by Pappy13 » Logged

That which does not kill me...gives me XP.
Pages: 1 2 [3] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

The Dolphins Make Me Cry - Copyright© 2008 - Designed and Marketed by Dave Gray


Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines