They didn't though. Fasano, Bess, and Hartline all had worse numbers under Moore than they did Henne. -EK
Depends on how you look at it. Henne had more yardage per attempt, but fewer TD's per attempt and more INT's per attempt. Completion percentage was nearly identical. (see below).
And if you add in Clay and Marshall, things get even further skewed toward Moore. Henne actually did well throwing the ball except when it comes to TD's where Moore far outshined him. Is that just coincidence? Hard to know for sure. Henne did seem to be a bit snake bit in the early games when Marshall for sure dropped a couple of certain TD's that would have helped his numbers tremendously. I don't think Moore was really that much better than Henne overall, but it was the perception because Moore started out TERRIBLE and picked up his play considerably as the season wore on. Was that due to him getting better, just having more reps with the players, weaker defenses, etc? Hard to say.
If I had to make a call, I'd say I'd go with Moore over Henne based on stats alone. And since Henne's contract is up and Moore's isn't, then the choice is obvious which one will be back and which one won't, but I don't think it's fair to say all those guys did worse with Moore.
Henne:
Fasano: 6 of 11 for 108 yards, no TD's and 1 INT.
Bess: 13 of 22 for 192 yards, no TD's and no INTs.
Hartline: 11 of 19 for 188 yards, 1 TD and 2 INTs.
Total: 30 of 52 for 57.7% and 9.4 yards,.019 TDs and 0.058 INTs per attempt.
Moore:
Fasano: 24 of 39 for 308 yards, 5 TD's and 1 INT.
Bess: 38 of 62 for 345 yards, 3 TD's and 2 INTs.
Hartline: 23 of 47 for 337 yards 0 TD's and 3 INTs.
Total: 85 of 147 for 57.8% and 6.73 yards,.054 TDs and .041 INTs per attempt.