Incentive based contract for receivers is a double edge sword, it has the benefit of paying a productivity player, but saving money on a less productive player.
Problems can occur if the player feels he is doing his part but isn’t being targeted enough, even without incentives it is not uncommon for there to be issues with receivers becoming disruptive because they feel they aren’t targeted enough.
+1
I think it's better to have a #1 receiver on an incentive based contract, when it's the #3 receiver not so much. Tua was very good last year at getting rid of the ball quickly, but that came at the detriment of him being able to go through his progressions. IMO that leaves OBJ with only plays that are designed to go to him, and if Hill and Waddles are healthy that doesn't leave much for him.