I think the way Tenshot is looking at Rice's stats is part of the problem with the way voting is.
Tenshot is also looking at him in a way that a lot of 21 year old kids look at a stat line only. No offense, Tenshot, but I doubt you are old enough to ever watch Rice play, and how his play changed the game, back "in the day."
Jim Rice changed the way his position was played, for starters. He was THE most feared hitter in the game for a long time - and had power numbers when hitters simply didn't have power numbers.
*All Star - 8 times (left and right field)
*1978 MLB MVP.
*Finished in top three of MVP voting
seven other times.*Six seasons was in the top three in batting average.
*Two Silver Slugger awards
*Eight seasons in top ten of slugging percentage, career % was .502 (staggering)
*Eight seasons was in the top ten in hits.
*Seven seasons was in the top ten in home runs. Lead the league three times, was second another.
*Nine seasons was in the top ten in RBI.
The only player in history to have over 2,000 hits and 1,000 walks. Almost 400 home runs. All this without three random 55 home runs seasons, Rice was the model of consistency.
Jim Rice wasn't a good player, he was a GREAT player. He was a game changer and he should have been in years ago.
There is one more guy that also should be in - Andre Dawson. Hands down.