Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
March 11, 2025, 03:07:53 pm
Home Help Search Calendar Login Register
News: Brian Fein is now blogging weekly!  Make sure to check the homepage for his latest editorial.
+  The Dolphins Make Me Cry.com - Forums
|-+  TDMMC Forums
| |-+  Around the NFL (Moderators: Spider-Dan, MyGodWearsAHoodie)
| | |-+  Super Bowl: Why was the game-ending fumble not reviewed?
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] Print
Author Topic: Super Bowl: Why was the game-ending fumble not reviewed?  (Read 13826 times)
Dphins4me
Guest
« Reply #45 on: February 04, 2009, 09:36:42 pm »

I think he means after a review in which case the penalty had already happend like NADS said.
  That would be true, if the play was reversed under review.
Logged
YoFuggedaboutit
Guest
« Reply #46 on: February 04, 2009, 10:18:36 pm »

I was reading S.I. today.  They think the call was correct but it should have been reviewed just to make sure
Logged
NADS
Uber Member
*****
Posts: 691


27 years of heartache.


Email
« Reply #47 on: February 06, 2009, 12:30:59 am »

The penalty is what it is, regardless of the result of the play.  Recall the play in CLE vs. KC a few years back... the player "thought" the game was over because he saw 0:00 (and ostensibly would not have taken off his helmet if he knew the play was still live), but the play had not ended.  That does not excuse the penalty.

If what you are claiming were true, Harrison could have turned around and lit into Warner after the play had ended.  I mean, since he thought the game was over and the penalty wouldn't make a difference (PIT would still keep the ball and kneel it out), it's OK, right?

Personal fouls and unsportsmanlike conduct penalties don't work like that.

Good call.  Anyone remember who the LB was that jacked it up?
 
Logged
YoFuggedaboutit
Guest
« Reply #48 on: February 06, 2009, 08:01:49 am »

The penalty is what it is, regardless of the result of the play.  Recall the play in CLE vs. KC a few years back... the player "thought" the game was over because he saw 0:00 (and ostensibly would not have taken off his helmet if he knew the play was still live), but the play had not ended.  That does not excuse the penalty.

If what you are claiming were true, Harrison could have turned around and lit into Warner after the play had ended.  I mean, since he thought the game was over and the penalty wouldn't make a difference (PIT would still keep the ball and kneel it out), it's OK, right?

Personal fouls and unsportsmanlike conduct penalties don't work like that.

Exactly.  I recall the Dolphins-Niners game earlier this year.  With just seconds left to play, and the Niners facing fourth down, Joey Porter busts around the end and sacks Shaun Hill.  He then proceeds to rip his helmet off and run to the sidelines in jubilation.  He was assessed an unsportsmanlike conduct penalty, but the Dolphins kept the ball because it happened after the play was over.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

The Dolphins Make Me Cry - Copyright© 2008 - Designed and Marketed by Dave Gray


Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines