So, I'm guessing by your logic, LBJ is severely overrated because he doesn't perform well throughout the entire game right?
You seem to have gotten our positions confused.
YOU are the one who wants to ignore parts of the game to fit his worldview. I am 100% in favor of evaluating
entire games, which means:
- for LBJ, best player in the league for 3 quarters and a mediocre player for the 4th makes him a top 5 player
- for Tebow, near-worst player in the league for 3 quarters and an awesome 4th makes him mediocre
Would you rather have a guy who is great 3/4 of the game and then disappears in the final quarter, putting his team in a position to lose, or a guy who plays poorly 3/4 of the game and then is the best player in his sport (and don't even try to say he isn't- the numbers don't lie) in the fourth, putting his team in a position to win?
This is exactly what I'm talking about. You are succumbing to the media fallacy that the 4th quarter is somehow more important than the others.
Would you care to discuss Aaron Rodgers 4th quarter performances this year? Hell, would you like to discuss them over his career?
Here is a good primer. But here's the thing:
when you do your job in the first three quarters, you don't need 4th quarter heroics to win!The two biggest stories in the NFL this year are the Packers and Tebow, but ESPN, the NFL, every media outlet, and every sportscaster must ALL be wrong and you guys must be right.
Who is saying Tebow isn't a big
story? Stop inventing strawmen.
P.S. I'm still waiting for you to explain why you rank Tebow above Rivers and Moore when his passer rating is worse.