Landshark
Guest
|
|
« on: July 27, 2012, 09:10:55 am » |
|
I'm cautiously optimistic. What about y'all?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Landshark
Guest
|
|
« Reply #3 on: July 27, 2012, 09:53:41 am » |
|
No Tannehill. It was already a long-shot that he'd be a starter any time soon, and holding out through training camp isn't going to help that. -EK
I don't get why he is holding out. With the rookie wage scale in place, its not like he has much leverage in negotiations. Good to see you back. Where ya been?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Landshark
Guest
|
|
« Reply #13 on: July 27, 2012, 12:24:22 pm » |
|
Actually it is less of a catch-22 for the Dolphins than for Tannehill. A team's instance that the clause remain makes sense. The agent wanting the modification makes sense. The player (himself, not the agent) wanting the modification is a sign of lack of confidence and/or the player listening to the agent instead of his heart.
I bet most players' (including Tannehill and Kalil) attitude is "fuck that, I don't need that, I not going to be bust, how about you get the team to include a clause that says I get an extra million bucks when I make the pro-bowl my rookie year."
I have to agree with the latter part of this post. If you want to dock his pay if he underperforms, you gotta increase his bonus if he overperforms.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|