If you're going to use that, then you're wrong about their records, too. The game Tannehill got injured in he had 5 attempts for 18 yards. Moore played "extensively" (your word) in that game, and the win should be to his credit, not Tannehill's. In fact- Moore played more minutes against the Jets (came in at 10:09 of the first) than he did against SD (came in at 5:51 of the first), so it would appear that Tannehill also only has three wins to his credit by your logic.
Fine by me. Tannehill was 3-4 in his first 7 games for Miami then and Moore was 3-4 in his first 7 games for Miami as well. Doesn't change the fact that Moore was a 4 year veteran with 22 games under his belt and Tannehill was playing in his first 7 games in the NFL. The fact that they were pretty much the same in those games tells you everything you need to know. Tannehill as a ROOKIE is is every bit as good as Moore AFTER 4 FREAKING YEARS IN THE NFL. The fact that you actually think that makes for a good comparison is hilarious.
Again, I refuse to grade on a curve.
Of course you do. Everybody ELSE who knows ANYTHING about football disagrees with you. You're like the ostrich with his head in the sand saying "I don't understand why everyone else can't see this!"
Author