Zimmerman at it again

[EKnight]

No, he's automatically guilty because you THINK he is. Keep listening to and basing your judgments on the media. Maybe you'll be 0-2 after all is said and done, lol. 

"0-2"? "LOL"? A child lost his life at the hands of this guy, and you're trivializing it as if it were a baseball score? I might be the world's biggest ass and even I see that this is wrong. -EK

[Buddhagirl]

Here we go with the spin. Yes most information comes from the media. However, in an attempt to "push an agenda" or "be the first to get a story out" they usually spin, lie, and outright make things up when stories first break. If you need proof of that, see some of the initial Sandy Hook stories or some of the initial Trayvon-Zimmerman stories. The point is that the media is rarely correct on the important facts on breaking stories. Eventually, all the real facts leak out and an informed opinion can be formed. But saying someone is guilty or abusive is irresponsible without having all of the information needed to make that determination.

You obviously are not going to say where you get your info from, so whatever.

Zimmerman's wife said that he is verbally abusive, so I'm not sure what you're arguing here:

http://abcnews.go.com/US/george-zimmermans-wife-selfish-feels-invincible/story?id=20174763

He had a restraining order from a domestic violence incident with a past girlfriend. Those are FACTS.  So, yes I wold call him abusive.

[pondwater]

"0-2"? "LOL"? A child lost his life at the hands of this guy, and you're trivializing it as if it were a baseball score? I might be the world's biggest ass and even I see that this is wrong. -EK

While someone losing their life is tragic, everyone dies eventually. Innocent people die everyday in much worse ways, I don't hear you crying for them. Anyhow, I wouldn't classify a 6 foot tall 17 year old a child. And as much as you want to play the sympathy card for Martin, you have to remember that he was shot while assaulting the person that shot him. The jury found him "not guilty" and their opinion is the only one that matters.

[pondwater]

You obviously are not going to say where you get your info from, so whatever.

Zimmerman's wife said that he is verbally abusive, so I'm not sure what you're arguing here:

http://abcnews.go.com/US/george-zimmermans-wife-selfish-feels-invincible/story?id=20174763

He had a restraining order from a domestic violence incident with a past girlfriend. Those are FACTS.  So, yes I wold call him abusive.

And Zimmerman said that his wife hit him with an iPad. So he was verbally abusive and she was physically abusive? So to you, her word is better than his? After all she is the one that was convicted of lying not him. He was convicted of nothing. Plenty of unanswered questions.

[Spider-Dan]

And as much as you want to play the sympathy card for Martin, you have to remember that he was shot while assaulting the person that shot him.

And when was Martin convicted of assault, exactly?

The fact that Zimmerman was acquitted of murder does not, in any way, prove that Martin assaulted Zimmerman.  That is, unless it is also equally "proven" that Caylee Anthony was kidnapped by some undetermined stranger.

[pondwater]

And when was Martin convicted of assault, exactly?

The fact that Zimmerman was acquitted of murder does not, in any way, prove that Martin assaulted Zimmerman.  That is, unless it is also equally "proven" that Caylee Anthony was kidnapped by some undetermined stranger.

He had injuries consistent with being assaulted and Martin had none. Plus the little fact that his defense was self defense and he was found not guilty. The jury must have believed he was defending himself. Common sense.

[Spider-Dan]

Casey Anthony's defense was that someone else kidnapped and killed Caylee.
The jury found Casey Anthony not guilty.
By your logic, this proves that someone else kidnapped and killed Caylee Anthony.

[Buddhagirl]

And Zimmerman said that his wife hit him with an iPad. So he was verbally abusive and she was physically abusive? So to you, her word is better than his? After all she is the one that was convicted of lying not him. He was convicted of nothing. Plenty of unanswered questions.

Link stating who smashed the iPad, please?

[EKnight]

While someone losing their life is tragic, everyone dies eventually. Innocent people die everyday in much worse ways, I don't hear you crying for them. Anyhow, I wouldn't classify a 6 foot tall 17 year old a child. And as much as you want to play the sympathy card for Martin, you have to remember that he was shot while assaulting the person that shot him. The jury found him "not guilty" and their opinion is the only one that matters.

Doesn't matter what YOU would call him. 17 is a minor. A minor is a child.

The jury found Zimmerman not guilty. Not once did he or anyone else claim he didn't kill Martin. Just because he was acquitted doesn't mean a human life wasn't lost or that that fact should be minimalized and laughed about like you did.  -EK

[pondwater]

Casey Anthony's defense was that someone else kidnapped and killed Caylee.
The jury found Casey Anthony not guilty.
By your logic, this proves that someone else kidnapped and killed Caylee Anthony.

Were Zimmermans injuries caused by Martin?

[pondwater]

Link stating who smashed the iPad, please?

Damn girl, go google it. Somewhere Zimmerman stated that his wife hit him with the iPad and that is how it got broken.

[pondwater]

Doesn't matter what YOU would call him. 17 is a minor. A minor is a child.

The jury found Zimmerman not guilty. Not once did he or anyone else claim he didn't kill Martin. Just because he was acquitted doesn't mean a human life wasn't lost or that that fact should be minimalized and laughed about like you did.  -EK

Oh, make no mistake. I wasn't laughing at Martin dying. I was poking fun at people who jump the gun and want to crucify people before they know the facts about what's going on.

[EKnight]

The man shot and killed a child. That is an absolute and undeniable FACT about what went on. Zimmerman himself didn't deny it. There's no place for the phrase "lol" in any commentary about a dead kid. -EK

[pondwater]

The man shot and killed a child. That is an absolute and undeniable FACT about what went on. Zimmerman himself didn't deny it. There's no place for the phrase "lol" in any commentary about a dead kid. -EK

I have already explained it as much as I'm going to. I will type "lol" when and where I want to. If you don't like it, that's your problem. Is that FACT enough for you? Go argue with MikeO or something

[EKnight]

Ohhhhh we got a tough guy here! You go right ahead and use it whenever you need to to make you feel better about your own inadequacies. If trivializing the death of a child makes you feel better about your lack of manhood, then go right ahead, but know that there will always be people who will speak out against it, whether it's me or someone else. -EK