Citizens are allowed to vote for much more than just President, so I don't know why you keep bringing this up.
We already went over this.I'll keep correcting you as long as you keep pushing the lie that peoples "constitutional right to determine who is in control of our government" are being violated by voter ID. It's a moot point anyhow. Because the SCOTUS has ruled government-issued photo voter ID legal and constitutional. Therefore, no one's rights are being violated and you are wrong and/or lying.
If it's not hard to get, surely you won't object to every citizen being guaranteed a free state ID before we implement voter ID laws.
Sure, I don't object to a free government ID that functions as a government photo ID, voter ID, Driver's licence, and nationwide CCW reciprocity card. As long as applying in person and following the
REAL ID compliant protocol when issued. Which includes providing approved forms of: Proof of primary identification, proof of Social Security, and proof of residential address.
Yes, because our government is a democratic republic and banks are a capitalist business. Those things are not the same.
Telling people "Go find another government if you don't like this one" is a ridiculous comparison to choosing a bank.
It's not ridiculous to move to another state or country that fits your political views better, it's called freedom. It's what this country was founded on. Thousands of people do it every week.
The whole point of different states is that they are different. The whole point of different countries is because they are different. If you prefer to not deal with
legally and constitutionally being required to submit valid government photo ID to vote. By all means, exercise your freedom and go somewhere that better fits your belief system and doesn't require voter ID. No one is being forced to do anything, at this point everyone has a choice.
I know that the left wants to force their agenda on
everyone and make all the states the same and model the country like other countries, but everyone doesn't agree with that agenda. What a shitty world it would be if that agenda ever happens.
The answer is maybe; it depends on the bank.
I assure you that I could prove my identity at my own bank without a photo ID.
Well I'm glad that you're some kind of special unicorn. But I'm pretty sure that almost all banks require ID to make a withdrawal in person at the teller window.
Now that begs the question. Why would Spider-Dan try to prove his identity without a commonplace photo ID? What's the point? I thinks someone is either bullshitting and/or high on some illegal substance so they can pat themselves on the back.
You're making a circular argument: things are the way they are because that's the way they are. There's no reason we can't require photo ID every time you fire a gun, just like you want to require photo ID every time you cast a vote. And your decision to call voting a transaction is arbitrary; it is not necessary to have an interaction between people to cast a vote.
Go to the location, show your ID, secure your firearm, you're done until you have to come back to pick another firearm, then rinse and repeat.
Go to the location, show your ID, secure your liquor, you're done until you have to come back to pick another bottle, then rinse and repeat.
Go to the location, show your ID, secure your candidate, you're done until you have to come back to pick another candidate, then rinse and repeat.