Questionable call by the Refs today on the "Hill Fumble". Did Hill actually catch the ball and make a football move? I guarantee if this was 30 yards down field and the fumble went out of bounds they would have ruled it incomplete. Not to mention Hill stopped the guys forward progress before he lateraled it.
It was incomplete. But whatever, that's easy to fuck up.
What is not fair, though, is not to call him for forward progress, if it indeed was a catch. If you're saying that the ball was secured immediately, then the fumble happens after Hill is pushed several yards back and should be a dead ball. So, it's the wrong call to say it was a catch, but even if you get that wrong, you must call him on progress. If you're saying the ball wasn't secured immediately, then he didn't possess the ball to call it a catch. You can't have it both ways.