Meta Says Fact-Checkers Were the Problem. Fact-Checkers Rule That False.

[CF DolFan]

Zuckerberg admitted yesterday that conservatives were being censored and blamed the fact-checkers. The fact checker company says that's false and it was all Zuck and company. HAHAHA that's a pretty funny scene. It's been pretty obvious the fact checkers left out conservative truths in order to push the liberal agenda for years. It's also pretty obvious Zuckerberg has been behind this since day one. I guess its good that more people have noticed and free speech is making a comeback.


https://www.nytimes.com/2025/01/07/business/mark-zuckerberg-meta-fact-check.html

[MyGodWearsAHoodie]

He never specifically mentioned conservatives.  If anything Facebooks problem has been holding liberal views to a much higher scrutiny  than conservative ones. Not surprising given that the fact checkers he uses lean right. 

[Spider-Dan]

Pretty hilarious that the book banning crew is still going on about "free speech."

So I guess y'all are fine with Drag Queen Story Hour now?

[CF DolFan]

Pretty hilarious that the book banning crew is still going on about "free speech."

So I guess y'all are fine with Drag Queen Story Hour now?

The only place books are being removed is public schools. According to you I guess they should stock porn videos too in the name of free speech. Seem like you aren't even trying anything but name calling .... which I would have thought from the election results you would have learned that doesn't work any longer. hahaha

[Spider-Dan]

The only place books are being removed is public schools.

That doesn't sound like "free speech."
I guess the trick is to compare all books you disagree with to pornographic video, at which point "free speech" stops being a concern!

Seem like you aren't even trying anything but name calling .... which I would have thought from the election results you would have learned that doesn't work any longer. hahaha

I say "book banning crew" not as name calling, but as an accurate description of a policy position that you are, at this very moment, in the process of defending.

But even if I were name calling, that's still a hell of a lot better than trying to overthrow the government because I can't accept a loss!
I mean, while we are talking about how people respond to election results.

[CF DolFan]

He never specifically mentioned conservatives.  If anything Facebooks problem has been holding liberal views to a much higher scrutiny  than conservative ones. Not surprising given that the fact checkers he uses lean right. 

Wow ... what land do you live in? He specifically said the government has been suppressing content. It isn't like Republicans have been controlling the narrative.

"The recent elections also feel like a cultural tipping point towards, once again, prioritizing speech," he said. "So we're going to get back to our roots and focus on reducing mistakes, simplifying our policies and restoring free expression on our platforms."

Zuckerberg pointed to the election as a major influence on the company's decision and criticized "governments and legacy media" for, he alleged, pushing "to censor more and more."

Leagacy media isn't conservative but you will probably argue that's who they are referring to.

[CF DolFan]

That doesn't sound like "free speech."
I guess the trick is to compare all books you disagree with to pornographic video, at which point "free speech" stops being a concern!
I say "book banning crew" not as name calling, but as an accurate description of a policy position that you are, at this very moment, in the process of defending.

But even if I were name calling, that's still a hell of a lot better than trying to overthrow the government because I can't accept a loss!
I mean, while we are talking about how people respond to election results.

Seriously .. these are worn out lies made up by the people seeking pardons now. Innocent people don't need pardons and they damn sure don't destroy evidence. You guys should literally sue Democrats and main stream media for breaking you. It isn't fair at all. Hahaha

[Spider-Dan]

First you lecture about "free speech" while supporting book bans, and then you say "Innocent people don't need pardons" in response to J6, the participants of which have been begging for Trump pardons since the day it happened.

Republicans become more and more like their idol every day.

[CF DolFan]

First you lecture about "free speech" while supporting book bans, and then you say "Innocent people don't need pardons" in response to J6, the participants of which have been begging for Trump pardons since the day it happened.

Republicans become more and more like their idol every day.

January 6th was not what you portray. Most people seemed to have figure that out by now but for anyone else who is actually open to truth it to be fully exposed when the powers that be take office. One person died that day and she was literally shot in the back by Capital Police. Unfortunately she wasn't black so that you guys would care too.

[Sibster]

January 6th was not what you portray. Most people seemed to have figure that out by now but for anyone else who is actually open to truth it to be fully exposed when the powers that be take office. One person died that day and she was literally shot in the back by Capital Police. Unfortunately she wasn't black so that you guys would care too.

Yep.  Where were Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton on that one.   And where were they when Tyre Nichols was killed by Memphis police? 

[MyGodWearsAHoodie]

January 6th was not what you portray. Most people seemed to have figure that out by now but for anyone else who is actually open to truth it to be fully exposed when the powers that be take office. One person died that day and she was literally shot in the back by Capital Police. Unfortunately she wasn't black so that you guys would care too.

You really do have a problem with facts.  Five people, not one, died including a police officer. 

The thing the BLM protests all have in common is the person killed was NOT a threat.  Rabbet was. 

[Fau Teixeira]

i saw the video .. wasn't she shot in the front literally as she was trying to climb through a barricaded door with a window that was just smashed open?

[Fau Teixeira]

January 6th was not what you portray. Most people seemed to have figure that out by now but for anyone else who is actually open to truth it to be fully exposed when the powers that be take office. One person died that day and she was literally shot in the back by Capital Police. Unfortunately she wasn't black so that you guys would care too.

What was january 6th ? Out of curiosity, how does the "truth" look like to you ?

[Spider-Dan]

What was january 6th ? Out of curiosity, how does the "truth" look like to you ?

I second this inquiry.

CF, what do YOU think really happened on January 6th?

[CF DolFan]

You really do have a problem with facts.  Five people, not one, died including a police officer. 

The thing the BLM protests all have in common is the person killed was NOT a threat.  Rabbet was. 

Seems you have your facts incorrect but then again you liked to include everyone who died of natural causes into your Covid numbers as well. Facts don't typically work out well for your arguments. Within 36 hours, five people died: one was shot by the Capitol Police on that day, another died of a drug overdose, and three died of natural causes, including a police officer who died of natural causes a day after being assaulted by rioters.

FYI ... Police and fire commonly die early due to stress of the jobs and is why they get to retire sooner than others. Its not an easy job from that aspect.